MULTI-MISSION STUDY(XMM/CHANDRA/ROSAT/Suzaku/Swift) We have a possibility to make one-to-one comparison of a few nearby, relaxed clusters with 5 different satellites (XMM/EPIC, CHANDRA/ACIS-I, ROSAT/PSPC, Suzaku/XIS and Swift/XRT). Larry agreed to do ACIS-I, Steve agreed to do PSPC, I will do XMM, my student Kimmo Kettula agreed to do Suzaku and Andy Beardmore will perhaps do Swift (we need a confirmation on this). We will use 3-6 arcmin annulus for the extraction of the spectra, so that - we minimise the scatter from the cool core (we are wasting data, but this enables the comparison with Suzaku which has a larger PSF) - we minimise the PSF scatter from and to our extraction region (again, dictated by Suzaku) - we stay in the bright part of the clusters and thus minimise background systematics. For the comparison, I need the spectra, responses, background and the actual extraction region (arcmin^2) after the exclusion of point sources, CCD gaps and other dead area. It would be good to use exactly the same regions for all instruments so that possible spatial variations of the temperature would cause no significant, additional variation when comparing the measurements from different instruments. However, the point sources are variable. In ideal case we should make a combined mask, which contains all the regions where any instrument detects significant point sources. I guess this would lead to significant data loss, and additionally we would have no emission left in Suzaku, for which we should use larger radii for exclusion due to large PSF. Thus, for the March meeting we exclude from each instrument the minimal number of point sources required to minimize the point source emission in the 3-6 arcmin annulus. It is up to each person involved here to estimate this for a given instrument. For selecting the observations common with the above five missions, we used these criteria: * The total exposure time must be at least 8 ks to obtain good enough statistics. * The center of the cluster must not be too much offset from the center of FOV so that we don't fold in instrument effects which are different between the central and outer regions of the FOV (e.g. vignetting). In the following table are listed the obsid:s which have the biggest exposure time and smallest off-axis angle. Other obdis:s may be used as well, as long as the cluster center is not more than 3 arcmin away from the center of FOV. If the clean exposure is below 10 ks, please use a better observation. As a cluster center we use the XMM values for A1795, A2029 and PKS0745-19. For Coma we use Steve's ROSAT centroid. Please, use these for consistence. A1795 center 207.22083, 26.590278 obsid off-axis exposure (arcmin) (ks) Suzaku/XIS 800012010 0.7 13 Swift/XRT 00035184002 3.0 13 ACIS-I 5289 0.1 15 XMM-Newton/EPIC 0097820101 0.2 34 ROSAT/PSPC RP800105N00 0.5 36 RP800055n00 1.8 26 A2029 center 227.734167, 5.744639 obsid off-axis exposure (arcmin) (ks) Suzaku/XIS 804024010 0.5 8 Swift/XRT 00035187004 2.0 26 ACIS-I 6101 0.0 10 XMM-Newton/EPIC 0551780401 1.0 47 ROSAT/PSPC RP800249N00 0.4 13 Coma center 194.9447, 27.932632 obsid off-axis exposure (arcmin) (ks) Suzaku/XIS 801097010 1.9 179 Swift/XRT 00035172001 1.9 10 ACIS-I 13996 1.1 125 XMM-Newton/EPIC 0300530301 0.5 31 ROSAT/PSPC RP800005N00 2.3 21 PKS0745-19 center 116.88051 -19.294847 obsid off-axis exposure (arcmin) (ks) Suzaku/XIS 802062010 0.4 32 Swift/XRT 00051650023 0.9 15 ACIS-I 6103 0.1 10 XMM-Newton/EPIC 0105870101 0.2 28 ROSAT/PSPC RP800623N00 0.3 10