...

Like GLab, 15.990 students work with teams of peers on a real-world project, dedicating three weeks of IAP to onsite work.  Unlike GLab, which sends students to host companies all over the globe, 15.990 projects are with companies in greater Boston.  This is a critical difference, since 15.990 projects are designed to go "beyond consulting."  With locally-based hosts, 15.990 projects allow for multi-stage engagements, where students develop and execute mini-experiments, to gather data and advance real learning at their host organization.  Their work over IAP informs continued engagement with their host in spring H1.  GLab projects, on the other hand, tend to be a one-stage engagement, without expectation of ongoing involvement for student teams .  GLab -- although student invovlement during the actual engagement is very intense.  GLab students conduct an analysis and make recommendations - -- possibly developing a business plan, market analysis, or new-market-entry strategy for a foreign firm.  This is essential a one-off   While interaction is clearly centralto GLab projects, because of their nature, this is essentially a consultative approach, where GLab projects are scoped such that all work for the host may be completed by the end of IAP.  During Spring H1, GLab students deliver final presentations to their professors and peers, reflect on their learning, and speculate on the potential impact of their recommendations (if their hosts follow through).  During Spring H1, 15.990 students remain intimately engaged with their host companies. They develop and execute additional mini-experiments, and make a strategic hand-off, so that hosts take ownership of student work, and take it to the next level.

Another point of contrast is that most of the classroom instruction for GLab addresses topics connected to entrepreneurship in a global setting, whereas in 15.990, the focus is on getting things done--being effective as a manager. 

Can you tell me what a 15.990 project might look like?

...