...
https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2017/12/epjconf_efm2017_02075.pdf
Calibration is key
Temperature Calibration Uncertainty detailed in Guide to exp. Of Uncertainty in Measurement
“Intrinsic Thermocouples” might give us better spatial resolution (microtips)
https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2017/12/epjconf_efm2017_02075.pdf
Seebeck effect
G,C,D are for high temp, K for VERY high temp
NiCr-NiAl used in experiment is oxidation proof, resistant to higher temps, reducing atmosphere, and sulphur compounds
“The thermocouple-based method has some limitations. One of the major problems is attaching a thermocouple to the surface to be measured. Incorrect bonding may cause the device to show a temperature lower than the actual one. When a thermocouple is used to measure the temperature of an element in a high frequency radio circuit, it may change the electrical characteristics of that circuit. A thermocouple fixed to a small electronic element may be responsible for the removal of heat from the element. As a result, the temperature displayed is lower than the actual temperature, i.e. one measured before the thermocouple was attached. Decalibration may lead to an error in measurement; it may change the electrical characteristics, which will make the reading inaccurate. Finally, an open thermocouple junction may also cause errors in temperature measurement [19]. "
Possibly add IR Thermal camera for data fusion
Vibration (Yasu)
...