Page History

...

• What happens to the theses after they have been scanned? - Jenn assumes they will be discarded since Archives has a copy. see email thread below.  However, need to decide on a procedure if the thesis can't be scanned.
• Jenn notes that color scanning of the theses did not start until after 2008.  Any theses scanned prior to this date in DSpace may be in black and white only, also may not be OCRed if considerably older.
• Rotch keeps theses in alpha order not in department/yr order
• Document Services can only handle 5 boxes at a time.  All other boxes will go to LSA.  Jenn then requests the remaining boxes as they work through the project.
• Document Services could not be reasonably ready until December 2nd.  However, there is a lot to do prior to Document Services so this is okay.   Shelf pull and withdrawal has to happen prior to Document Services.
• Ann Marie, Jenn, and Beverly recommend starting with Media Arts & Sciences since it is a smaller batch to test new process.

...

• Report (/"picklist") - out from Aleph. Needs author, title, degree, year, system #, OCLC#, URLs, box location
• Hard cover/Velo cover removal.  Hard covers once removed will remain together with the glue binding.  Velo covered will need to be clipped or tied together.
• Withdrawal - has to happen prior to scanning.  Who does this? Charlene's group or Preservation Services.   - Ann Marie to meet with Charlene regarding the freezer project perhaps that will shed light on this project. Will have Beth and others do this
• Check to see if in DSpace (handles will be on picklist).  Do we replace these theses because the scanning may not be OCRed or in color where needed? or do we check each one and decide on a case by case basis.  This would apply to approx. 431 Media Arts theses and 700 Urban planning theses in DSpace.
• Shelf pull.  Little to no preservation work is needed on these unless it is Preservation Services who does the withdrawal.   This may be a case where a student would work.  Beverly/Mikki's student: Joaquin Muray?

Email thread regarding post-scan procedure for theses:

----Original Message----
From: Millicent R Gaskell
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 9:30 AM
To: Christine Quirion; Jennifer S Banks
Cc: Marilyn G McSweeney; Nina Davis-Millis; irl-lib@mit.edu
Subject: RE: Operational decisions

Hi,

I confirmed with Jennifer that the expectation is that the divisional library copy would be recycled after scanning. If the title can't be scanned, however, we need to discuss what to do.

Millicent
________________________________________
From: Christine Quirion
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 9:45 AM
To: Jennifer S Banks
Cc: Millicent R Gaskell; Marilyn G McSweeney; Nina Davis-Millis; irl-lib@mit.edu
Subject: Re: Operational decisions

hi,

I don't see a problem with retaining some of the Rotch theses either on site or elsewhere when a scan cannot truly represent the content or for media preservation purposes,  but we will need to have a clear process to identify these situations and an efficient way to differentiate them from those theses where this kind of retention is not required.  I don't think we need to retain all the Rotch theses for this reason, so a work flow where we have 2 streams makes sense, but we should not design the process solely around the extreme cases.  We have experience as a system with working on 2 tracks, and did so for the EAPS scanning for similar reasons.

I think we'd be missing out on part of our investment in the processing and scanning of these items if we did not see some gains on the space side.  Would the theses we are retaining for preservation purposes and those that cannot be represented accurately by a single PDF file be stored at HD?

-Christine

On Nov 1, 2010, at 6:46 PM, Jennifer S Banks wrote:

Ann Whiteside and I had discussed a concern that Rotch theses often/sometimes have accompanying non-print formats (video, etc.).    The non-print content isn’t going into DSpace (yet), so there isn’t a repository copy.   We thought it would be a mistake to discard the divisional library copy because there’s no other back-up for the Archives copy.   Non-print media are usually less durable, and the 2nd copy provides the only safety net we have.

It sounds like Millicent is raising similar issues in the last sentence of her comment about the Rotch theses.

Jennifer

From: Christine Quirion \[[mailto:cquirion@MIT.EDU|https://owa.exchange.mit.edu/owa/redir.aspx?C=82478aa80eba47aaa7c5f90d464cc1dc&URL=mailto%3acquirion%40MIT.EDU]\]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 1:06 PM
To: Millicent R Gaskell
Cc: Marilyn G McSweeney; Nina Davis-Millis; irl-lib@mit.edu<mailto:irl-lib@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Operational decisions

so was the COP decision that the copies could be discarded as the norm except for cases where there is value to the item as 'artifact' or there were there is content that can't be represented with a scan?

who will determine exception vs. norm?

-Christine

On Oct 29, 2010, at 12:50 PM, Millicent R Gaskell wrote:

Hi,

The A&H CoP did discuss what to do with the divisional library copy of the historic theses to be scanned and I believe (but I’ll follow-up to confirm) that they agreed to discard the copy after scanning. We’re only doing a subset of the Rotch theses collection at this time (only specific degrees and a specific date range). Of that subset, there will likely be some (large foldouts, accompanying images, media) that can’t be done easily and that we may need to retain the divisional library print copy.

Millicent

From: Christine Quirion \[[mailto:cquirion@MIT.EDU|https://owa.exchange.mit.edu/owa/redir.aspx?C=82478aa80eba47aaa7c5f90d464cc1dc&URL=mailto%3acquirion%40MIT.EDU]\]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 10:53 AM
To: Marilyn G McSweeney
Cc: Nina Davis-Millis; irl-lib@mit.edu<mailto:irl-lib@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Operational decisions

hi,

a few more thoughts....

In other cases where this has come up, the retention strategy of the local unit was what drove the scanning of the items. For the ESL, for example, thesis items were weeded based on the ESL retention policy of the most recent ten years only in the library, and then they were candidates for scanning via the cheaper process of disbinding and scanning via document feeder.    Rotch's thesis retention policy has been to not weed, so their collection is complete. I believe Hum has a similar policy, but a smaller number of degrees are awarded so it hasn't come up yet as a space issue.

The second loose paper copy that was kept in shrink wrap as a result of the Lindgren closure was at the request of the EAPS department, and those copies are held at EAPS.

I agree with Marilyn that we should not take on the expense of keeping the second copies of earlier years once in DSpace, especially given the new model of not binding the second copy, but I suspect the staff affiliated with these collections in Rotch and the Arts/Hum COP may have different feelings about this and may want to be part of the conversation.  They have seen a value in retaining a complete collection up to this point and not retaining this second paper copy will be a new mode of operating.

-Christine

On Oct 28, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Marilyn G McSweeney wrote:

Somehow, I was thinking we had already discussed and decided that the second print copies of theses used for scanning would be “discarded”…  but of course, I’m not finding anything that confirms that.

We do  have a  recent example that may speak to this -- the EAPS thesis scanning project.  This was all negotiated and decided before I was involved, but  I was told that the Lindgren print copies (used for scanning) were shrink wrapped and deposited with the EAPS department, since otherwise they would be discarded.  I assume that Archives had right of first refusal in the unlikely case that  they needed to replace anything.  My understanding was that the theses were never destined to stay within the Libraries once they were scanned, and that it was a request of the EAPS department that they get to keep the chopped copies.

I must have nodded off at LC because I’ve forgotten whatever discussion there was about keeping a chopped up second paper copy of theses once they were in DSpace.  If we are willing to live with one paper copy and one electronic copy in DSpace beginning in July 2010 on, why would we want to keep the back second copies of earlier years once they are also in DSpace??

MGM

From: Nina Davis-Millis \[[mailto:ninadm@MIT.EDU|https://owa.exchange.mit.edu/owa/redir.aspx?C=82478aa80eba47aaa7c5f90d464cc1dc&URL=mailto%3aninadm%40MIT.EDU]\]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 2:55 PM
To: irl-lib@mit.edu<mailto:irl-lib@mit.edu>
Subject: Operational decisions
Importance: High

Greetings.   As discussed at our last meeting, plans are underway for the Rotch thesis scanning project.  Beverly needs a policy decision, not immediately but soon:

Are we prepared to implement a policy that local copies of theses will not be kept once the items are scanned and put into DSpace?  (Remember the Archives already has one paper copy; the DSpace copy would constitute the second copy.)

At a recent Lib. Council meeting there was discussion about retaining the physical copies, even if we’re withdrawing them from the local unit.  Do we still need to do this?  If so, where should they be kept?

Again, we really need some answers to these probably by early December.

Nina