Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Observations during User Testing

User 1:

This user grew up in a China for part of her life and moved to America when she was 12 years old. She said that she hadn't practiced reading in a long time but wanted to be able to review. Hence, the user could benefit from using this application, and thus matches the target audience.

Task 1

The user had no trouble creating an account. Although at log in, the user complained about waiting too long at the loading screen.

Task 2

The user selected the correct book and chapter. However, the user did not understand how to enable the words at first. At first she attempted to press the "Make study focus" buttons, but then realized that clicking multiple buttons undid the actions of previous button clicks. After realizing this, she then found the "Check All" button and used it.

Task 3

The user did not know how to complete this task alone. She did not know what the "Make study focus" button was supposed to do. When told what the button does, she did not know how to fetch a sentence. She complained that the panel below the 'fetch next sentence' button was blank and unintuitive what the panel was used for. She also complained about the wording used in the button, saying that it wasn't descriptive of the task of getting new sentences using checked words. She suggested teh wording "find sentences with checked words".

Task 4

The user had no problem with looking up the definition using the clickable buttons in the sentence and the translation. She focused the word by clicking the button on the popup.

Task 5

The user didn't have a problem forbidding the word from being shown.

Task 6

The user had no problem closing the sentences.

Task 7

The user had trouble locating the Closed Sentences tab and restoring the sentence. Although, she did complain about cosmetic issues. In particular, she thought there should be more horizontal spacing of sentences.

Task 8

The user had trouble noticing the study focus history button. So she searched for the desired focus word instead in order to change the focus. When asked why she didn't notice it, she said that it was too small and not obviously placed. This suggests that we need to design a way to grab the user's locus of attention better when the study focus is changed so that users will understand where the button is.

Task 9

The user had no problem with this task after having clicked the study focus history button in the previous step. However, the user suggested making the state of the system obvious. For example, she suggested using tabs to indicate that the state is in either "General Review" mode or "Study Focus" mode.

Task 10

The user had no problem with this step.

User 2:

This user grew up in a Chinese-speaking environment, and has basic reading proficiency. He was able to read the sentences that he encountered while doing the tasks for this user test. However, after the user test, when he enabled the remainder of the vocabulary, there were words that he needed to click on to discover their pronunciation and meaning. Hence, the user could benefit from using this application, and thus matches the target audience.

...