Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Let's test some of the ProjectX solvers for the case of a NACA0012 (? check ?) airfoil (2D) in compressible, inciscid flow:

Section
Column
width50%30%
Panel
titleInputs:
  • Common flow parameters:
    • Freestream Mach number: M = 0.5
    • Angle of attack: α = 0 °
    • Total pressure: Pt =
    • Total temperature: Tt =
    • Static temperature:
    • CFL: 1030
  • Common solver parameters:
    • Preconditioning:
      • Outer GMRES iterations (no. restarts): 20
      • Inner GMRES iterations (no. Krylov vectors): 200
    • Solution order: 2
    • PSequencing: False
Column
width50%70%
Panel
titleBoundary conditions:

Image Added

Wiki Markup
{center} {panel:title=Boundary conditions:} !nacabcs.png|border=1,scale=.6,width=388,height=292! {panel} {center}

Tests on linear solvers:

Section
Column
width50%
Panel
titleNewton-Jacobi (Left):
  • Nonlinear solver:
    • Newton
  • Preconditioner:
    • Block Jacobi (left)
  • Serial results:
    • Residual norm converges to 4.3571·10^-13^ after 5 iterations
    • Drag coefficient: CD = .5318 counts
    • Lift coefficient: CL = .9638 counts
Column
width50%
Panel
titleNewton-Jacobi (Right):
  • Nonlinear solver:
    • Newton
  • Preconditioner:
    • Block Jacobi (right)
  • Results:
    • Residual norm converges to 4.3532·10^-13^ after 5 iterations
    • Drag coefficient: CD = .5318 counts
    • Lift coefficient: CL = .9638 counts

...