Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Section
Column
width50%
Panel
titleBoundary conditions:

Column
width50%
Panel
titleInput Primal X-Momentum:

...

Linear solver tests:
Section
Column
width50%





Panel
titleWhat is being tested?

Listed below are the tolerances for the relevant data compared in the history files:

  • Solution update fraction: 0.1
  • Residaul norm: 10-10
  • Drag coefficient: 10-12
  • Lift coefficient: 10-12
Column
width50%
Panel
titleResidual convergence comparison:

...

Section
Column
width50%
Panel
titleNewton-Osher:
  • Nonlinear solver:
    • Newton
  • Linear solver:
    • Preconditioner: Threshold-based Incomplete LU
    • Side: Left
    • Reordering type: Minimum discarded fill
  • Serial results:
    • Residual norm converges to 5.6482·10-14 after 38 iterations
    • Drag coefficient: CD = .5319 counts
    • Lift coefficient: CL = .9653 counts
Column
width50%

...

Adjoint solver tests:
Section
Column
width55%
Panel
titleWhat is being tested?

Listed below are the tolerances for the relevant data compared in the history files:

  • Adjoint residual: 10-12
Panel
titleAdjoint solution:

For the primal solution, please refer to the Newton-ILU case above.

  • Adjoint parameters:
    • Adjoint solution computed using drag as output
    • Sensitivity parameter: Angle of attack
    • Forward sensitivities are computed (i.e. dCD/dα with a tangent linearization)
  • Serial results:
    • Adjoint residual norm converges to 1.8574·10-15 after 2 iterations
    • dCD/dα (forward sensitivity): 1.6544·10-3
    • dCD/dα (adjoint): 1.6544·10-3
Column
width45%
Panel
titleDual X-momentum:

...

Adaptation tests:
Section
Column
width50%
Panel
titleWhat is being tested?

Listed below are the tolerances for the relevant data compared in the history files:

  • Number of degrees of freedom on adapted meshes: 1
  • Error indicator: 10-12
  • Error estimate: 10-12
  • Drag: 10-12
Panel
titleAdaptation Test (boundary-curved):

For the primal solution, please refer to the Newton-ILU case above (with Nonlinear solver iterations limited to 50)

  • Adjoint parameters:
    • Adjoint output: Drag
    • Patch Reconstruction H1: False
    • Hessian Scalar Type: -1
      (Mach number for Hessian evaluation)
    • Nonlinear Smoother: Newton (solved to 10-6)
    • Adjoint Smoother residual converged to 10-6
    • Primal truth surrogate not fully converged
    • Adjoint truth fully converged
  • Adaptation parameters:
    • Output Adapted: Drag
    • Anisotropy method: Hessian
    • Curved re-meshing method: Boundary-curved
    • Number of adaptation iterations: 2
    • hp adaptation space
    • Adaptation algorithm: Fixed-Fraction marking
      • 30% refining and 20% coarsening fractions
      • Target degree-of-freedom increase factor: 1.0 (constant DOF)
    • Forward sensitivities are computed
      (i.e. dCD/dα with a tangent linearization)
  • Serial results:
    • Initial mesh:
      • DOF = 990
      • Error estimate = 3.9138·10-4
      • Drag = 5.3180·10-4
    • First adaptation:
      • DOF = 1008
      • Error estimate = 1.9066·10-4
      • Drag = 2.6942·10-4
    • Second adaptation:
      • DOF = 1026
      • Error estimate = 1.3617·10-4
      • Drag = 2.0600·10-4
Column
width50%
Panel
titleAdaptation Test (elasticity):
  • Almost all parameters are identical to the boundary-curved adaptation test. The only differing parameters are:
    • Target degree-of-freedom increase factor: 1.25
    • Curved re-meshing type: Elasticity
  • Serial results:
    • Initial mesh:
      • DOF = 990
      • Error estimate = 3.9138·10-4
      • Drag = 5.3180·10-4
    • First adaptation:
      • DOF = 1008
      • Error estimate = 1.8590·10-4
      • Drag = 2.6109·10-4
    • Second adaptation:
      • DOF = 1278
      • Error estimate = 8.5377·10-5
      • Drag = 1.3336·10-4





Panel
titlePrimal X-momentum after two adaptation iterations (elasticity):

...