Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Observations & Interviews

The Architect

  • An architecture student doing graduate-level training for professional architecture work
  • She feels that one of her biggest challenges as an arts student is the subjective nature of feedback
    • Hard to determine which feedback to listen to
    • Some art is MEANT to invoke a negative response -- how do you consider such feedback?
  • Most of the feedback she gets comes from gallery critiques, shows or critique sessions
    • Galleries are short and often more social than feedback-oriented
    • Critique sessions involve getting a number of people into a room where they may make comments, or take a pen and leave annotations/sketches on copies of the art in question
    • All of these sessions have time limits, so it's hard to get sufficient feedback
    • Success/feedback in such sessions often depends on how well you sell/present the work
    • Wiki Markup
      *\[ArtBark group\] This is very interesting, since it indicates that traditional feedback methods are frequently inefficient, and feedback from these sessions is typically hard to organize/interpret.*
  • She normally receives a wide variety of feedback** Type of feedback depends on reviewer
    • Emotional reactions are common
    • It's often very useful to hear simply whether people like/dislike your work
    • Structure/technique
      • Sometimes people like to sketch to illustrate a point
      • Such feedback often results in professors arguing/discussing with each other
    • A lot of people like giving references e.g. your work reminds me of..., your work should be more like...
  • Not a lot of students may utilize feedback since they're often on a tight schedule and don't have time for many iterations** More frequent feedback would be helpful
    • Online feedback would be helpful
  • Undergrad students may want to be able to keep variations/previous versions of their work for use in portfolios
  • Wants review audiences to have limited visibility of each other (e.g professors shouldn't be able to see what her friends think of her art)

- Most feedback comes from gallery critiques or mentor meetings

...