Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0

...

Section
Column
width50%
Panel
titleNewton-Jacobi (Left):
  • Nonlinear solver:
    • Newton
  • Linear solver:
    • Proconditioner: Block Jacobi
    • Side: Left
  • Serial results:
    • Residual norm converges to 4.3571·10-13 after 5 iterations
    • Drag coefficient: CD = .5318 counts
    • Lift coefficient: CL = .9638 counts
Column
width50%
Panel
titleNewton-Jacobi (Right):
  • Nonlinear solver:
    • Newton
  • Linear solver:
    • Preconditioner: Block Jacobi
    • Side: Right
  • Results:
    • Residual norm converges to 4.3532·10-13 after 5 iterations
    • Drag coefficient: CD = .5318 counts
    • Lift coefficient: CL = .9638 counts
Section
Column
width50%
Panel
titleNewton-ILU:
  • Nonlinear solver:
    • Newton
  • Linear solver:
    • Preconditioner: Incomplete LU (0)
    • Reordering type: Minimum discarded fill
    • Side: Left
  • Serial results:
    • Residual norm converges to 4.3566·10-13 after 5 iterations
    • Drag coefficient: CD = .5318 counts
    • Lift coefficient: CL = .9638 counts
  • Parallel results:
    • Residual norm converges to 4.3501·10-13 after 5 iterations
    • Drag coefficient: CD = .5318 counts
    • Lift coefficient: CL = .9638 counts
Column
width50%
Panel
titleNewton-ILUT:
  • Nonlinear solver:
    • Newton
  • Linear solver:
    • Preconditioner:Threshold-based Incomplete LU (ILUT)
    • Reordering type: Minimum discarded fill
    • Side: Right
    • Drop threshold: 10-3
  • Serial results:
    • Residual norm converges to 4.3538·10-13 after 5 iterations
    • Drag coefficient: CD = .5318 counts
    • Lift coefficient: CL = .9638 counts
  • Parallel results:
    • Residual norm converges to 4.3539·10-13 after 5 iterations
    • Drag coefficient: CD = .5318 counts
    • Lift coefficient: CL = .9638 counts
Section
Column
width50%
Panel
titleNewton-ILU Multigrid:
  • Nonlinear solver:
    • Newton
  • Linear solver:
    • Incomplete LU (0) (left) preconditioner
      • Reordering type: Minimum discarded fill
      • Side: Right
    • P = 0 linear multigrid for coarse correction
  • Serial results:
    • Residual norm converges to 3.8091·10-13 after 5 iterations
    • Drag coefficient: CD = .5318 counts
    • Lift coefficient: CL = .9638 counts
  • Parallel results:
    • Residual norm converges to 4.3501·10-13 after 5 iterations
    • Drag coefficient: CD = .5318 counts
    • Lift coefficient: CL = .9638 counts
Column
width50%
Panel
titleNewton-ILU-ASM (with/without multigrid):
  • Nonlinear solver:
    • Newton
  • Linear solver:
    • Preconditioner: Incomplete LU (ILU)
    • Parallel preconditioner: Additive Schwarz Method (ASM)
    • Side: Right
    • Reordering type: Minimum discarded fill
    • Outer GMRES iterations: 2
    • Inner GMRES iterations: 20
  • Parallel results (without multigrid):
    • Residual norm converges to 4.3736·10-13 after 5 iterations
    • Drag coefficient: CD = .5318 counts
    • Lift coefficient: CL = .9638 counts
  • Parallel results (with multigrid):
    • Residual norm converges to 3.8106·10-13 after 5 iterations
    • Drag coefficient: CD = .5318 counts
    • Lift coefficient: CL = .9638 counts
Section
Column
width50%
Panel
titleNewton-UMFPACK:
  • Nonlinear solver:
    • Newton
  • Linear solver:
    • Preconditioner: Threshold-based Incomplete LU
    • Side: Right
    • Reordering type: Minimum discarded fill
  • Serial results:
    • Residual norm converges to 4.3559·10-13 after 5 iterations
    • Drag coefficient: CD = .5318 counts
    • Lift coefficient: CL = .9638 counts
  • Parallel results:
    • Residual norm converges to 4.3506·10-13 after 5 iterations
    • Drag coefficient: CD = .5318 counts
    • Lift coefficient: CL = .9638 counts
Column
width50%
Panel
titleLean Jacobi:
  • Nonlinear solver:
    • Lean Jacobi
  • Linear solver:
    • Preconditioner: None
  • Serial results:
    • Residual norm converges to 4.7345·10-4 after 200 iterations
    • Drag coefficient: CD = .5098 counts
    • Lift coefficient: CL = .9478 counts
  • Parallel results:
    • Residual norm converges to 4.7345·10-4 after 200 iterations
    • Drag coefficient: CD = .5098 counts
    • Lift coefficient: CL = .9478 counts
Section
Column
width50%
Panel
titleNewton-Osher:
  • Nonlinear solver:
    • Newton
  • Linear solver:
    • Preconditioner: Threshold-based Incomplete LU
    • Side: Left
    • Reordering type: Minimum discarded fill
  • Serial results:
    • Residual norm converges to 5.6482·10-14 after 38 iterations
    • Drag coefficient: CD = .5319 counts
    • Lift coefficient: CL = .9653 counts
Column
width50%

...

Section
Column
width50%
Panel
titleWhat is being tested?

Listed below are the tolerances for the relevant data compared in the history files:

  • Number of degrees of freedom on adapted meshes: 1
  • Error indicator: 10-12
  • Error estimate: 10-12
  • Drag: 10-12
Panel
titleAdaptation Test (boundary-curved):

For the primal solution, please refer to the Newton-ILU case above (with Nonlinear solver iterations limited to 50)

  • Adjoint parameters:
    • Adjoint output: Drag
    • Patch Reconstruction H1: False
    • Hessian Scalar Type: -1
      (Mach number for Hessian evaluation)
    • Nonlinear Smoother: Newton (solved to 10-6)
    • Adjoint Smoother residual converged to 10-6
    • Primal truth surrogate not fully converged
    • Adjoint truth fully converged
  • Adaptation parameters:
    • Output Adapted: Drag
    • Anisotropy method: Hessian
    • Curved re-meshing method: Boundary-curved
    • Number of adaptation iterations: 2
    • hp adaptation space
    • Adaptation algorithm: Fixed-Fraction marking
      • 30% refining and 20% coarsening fractions
      • Target degree-of-freedom increase factor: 1.0 (constant DOF)
    • Forward sensitivities are computed
      (i.e. dCD/dα with a tangent linearization)
  • Serial results:
    • Initial mesh:
      • DOF = 990
      • Error estimate = 3.9138·10-4
      • Drag = 5.3180·10-4
    • First adaptation:
      • DOF = 1008
      • Error estimate = 1.9066·10-4
      • Drag = 2.6942·10-4
    • Second adaptation:
      • DOF = 1026
      • Error estimate = 1.3617·10-4
      • Drag = 2.0600·10-4
Column
width50%
Panel
titleAdaptation Test (elasticity):
  • Almost all parameters are identical to the boundary-curved adaptation test. The only differing parameters are:
    • Target degree-of-freedom increase factor: 1.25
    • Curved re-meshing type: Elasticity
  • Serial results:
    • Initial mesh:
      • DOF = 990
      • Error estimate = 3.9138·10-4
      • Drag = 5.3180·10-4
    • First adaptation:
      • DOF = 1008
      • Error estimate = 1.8590·10-4
      • Drag = 2.6109·10-4
    • Second adaptation:
      • DOF = 1278
      • Error estimate = 8.5377·10-5
      • Drag = 1.3336·10-4





Panel
titlePrimal X-momentum after two adaptation iterations (elasticity):

...