Selecting Locations for the Reserves
Given the conservative 10% target for coverage area targets, clear thought must be given to maximizing the impact influence of each protected unit of ocean area protected. We again emphasize that it is not the size of individual sanctuaries that is the most important matter, but rather the global scale of coverage (Guenétte , et . al., 2003). There
There are several general principles that should be followed when selecting locations for marine reserves. To properly function as a buffer against external exploitation, the 10% of ocean area must include a globally representative sample of habitats and ecosystems should be protected (Ballantine 1991). Particular Particular emphasis should be placed on protecting especially fragile, unique, or threatened ecosystems. Furthermore, when possible, multiple, discrete examples of each habitat type should be protected to insure against localized disturbances. Finally, individual Marine Reserves marine reserves should be set up in mutually reinforcing networks to maximize their collective influence. Such systems rely on The proper layout of such systems relies heavily on accurate knowledge of the physical processes in play in a given area, especially the activity of advective and convective current systems, and the biological responses to such physical factors (Johnson, Funicelli, & Bohnsack 1999 and Ballantine 1991).. As such, continual refinement of such data through future research is very important to effective placement of the marine reserves.
Although the no-take zones in this proposal are intended to primarily target entire ecosystems, we acknowledge that there are biological or economic situations in which a certain species is of particular importance. In such cases, a thorough understanding of the relevant biology and ecology is critically important. For example, a When aiming to protect multiple species within a single MPA, it is necessary to consider the migratory patterns and mobility of such species. A very mobile fish population would have a faster biomass exchange rate from within the MPA to outside of itthrough a marine reserve, rendering an MPA it less effective than it would be for a less mobile species that was less likely to move outside of the MPA. Also MPAs must be . As such, no-take zones are best placed along the axis of movement for given populations as opposed to perpendicular. This increases configuration maximizes the time the fish will remain within the MPA reserve and therefore decreases the likelihood of being caughthence the protective effect. (Watson, Alder, Walters, 2000)
Difficulties Further difficulties arise when trying to use MPAs marine reserves are used to protect highly migratory species. It would be inefficient and controversial to try to place an MPA to cover a reserve over the entire migration path of a population. Therefore in order to target a migratory species one possiblity One possibility is a configuration that targets key life states and/or migratory routes of the target species (Robichaud & Rose 2004). A land-based analogy is the protection of bird nesting sites and reserves for migratory birds, respectively. Another option is the implementation of dynamic MPAsprotected areas. By continuously tracking indicators of concentrations of the migratory fish population, such as ocean fronts, the boundaries of the MPA can be changed regularly to keep up with the population. With an everchanging boundary, however, confusion as to what is or is not allowed can develop leading to problems for fishermen and those trying to regulate the MPAto follow populations. However, we do acknowledge that an ever changing boundary can give rise to significant confusion. (Hyrenbach, Worm, Fonteneau, Gilman, 2007)
Although the No-Take Zones in this proposal are intended to primarily target entire ecosystems, we acknowledge that there are biological or economic situations in which a certain organism is of particular importance. In such cases, an understanding of the relevant biology and ecology is critically important. For example, key life stages or migration routes of the target species can be protected by careful placement of reserves (Robichaud & Rose 2004). A land-based analogy is the protection of bird nesting sites and reserves for migratory birds, respectively. Zoning within MPAs Different levels of restriction outside of the no-take zone can solve the problem of certain species within the same area requiring different levels of protection. This method has been used in existing MPAs to provide strict place the strictest restrictions on those populations that are most in danger of long-term extinction. the areas inhabited by the most threatened populations (Marine 2007) Another form of zoning regards . Such "zoning" can be distributed in any spatial dimension. One particular method involves so-called "vertical zoning. Vertical " Vertical zoning allows MPAs to the protection of target species that live in a particular depth of the ocean without completely restricting fish halting fisheries in that area. These can be particularly useful when protecting life on the ocean floor from particular destructive methods of fishing such as trawling. (U.S. 2006)
When setting up marine reserves, it is also important to consider potential ecological or physical barriers that will prevent the occurrence of spillover, and therefore thereby reduce the ability of the protected area to enhance adjacent fisheries. For instance, one study in the Turks and Caicos Islands found that numerous shallow sand habitats enclosed a population of conch, reducing its spillover into nearby areas (A. Tewfik and C. Bene, 2003).
Of course, there are also the practical matters of cost and enforceability that must be factored into any setup of marine protected areas. Creating a layout for Marine reserves that optimizes these This vast array of considerations can seem daunting. The optimal layout of marine reserves must consider numerous biological, physical, and social factors is a complex issue, as well as the very practical issues of cost and enforceability. Fortunately, there exist several sophisticated environmental modeling packages such as Marxan (Possingham, Ball, & Andleman 2000), ResNet, and C-Plan that use stochastic statistical methods to optimize these many parameters. Naturally, these types of algorithms are only as accurate good as the input data put into them, so continued emphasis on the collection of scientific data is essential to the optimal design, and hence eventual success of marine reserves.
Figure 1. Graphic depicting possible marine protected areas, map data courtesy of Google Maps.
[WEBTEAM: (Please Hyperlink to EXTERNAL external "FURTHER RESEARCH PAGE)." with text, "For more on oceanographic research"]
[WEBTEAM: Please Provide hyperlink back to 10% Plan Page...]