Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin

...

Image Added

Shoemaker-Levy

...

Comet

...

Fragment

...

9

...

impacting

...

Jupiter

...

July

...

22

...

1994

...


Photo

...

from

...

Wikimedia

...

Commons

...

by

...

NASA/JPL

Image Added

Jupiter, showing the impact marks from fragments of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 in July 1994
Photo from Wikimedia Commons. Original by Hubble Space Telescope Comet Team and NASA

Composition Setup

Excerpt
hiddentrue

Calculation of Effective Cross-Section of a planet with gravity (interaction)

Because gravity (interaction) will act to pull meteors, comets, and other space debris toward a planet, the effective cross-section for a planet to capture an object is larger than its geometrical cross-section. What is the size of this effective cross-section in terms of the physical qualities of the planet and the situation? What features of the impacting body is it independent of?

Solution

Toggle Cloak
idsys
System:
Cloak
idsys

subject to but moving with constant .

Toggle Cloak
idint
Interactions:
Cloak
idint

.

Toggle Cloak
idmod
Model:
Cloak
idmod

Conservation of Energy and Conservation of Angular Momentum.

Toggle Cloak
idapp
Approach:

Cloak
idapp

Toggle Cloak
iddiag
Diagrammatic Representation

Cloak
iddiag

The initial situation with distances and velocities

Image Added

The Force Diagram of the Meteor approaching the Planet

Image Added

The torque (single-axis) about the center of the planet is zero, because the force of gravity (interaction) acts along the same direction as the radius r. About this point, therefore, angular momentum about a single axis is conserved.

Positions and velocity final:

Image Added

Cloak
diag
diag

Toggle Cloak
idmath
Mathematical Representation

Cloak
idmath

We can calculate the effective Capture Radius b by setting this as the distance the path of the mass is displaced from one running through the center of the planet for the situation where the mass just touches the surface of the planet at its closest approach. The offset between the path of the object and the center of the planet is usually called the impact parameter, and we are looking for its critical value. Once we have it, we can turn it into a cross-section for capture by squaring it and multiplying by π .

We begin by recognizing that both Energy and Angular Momentum (about the planet's center) are conserved. Some of the object's gravitational Potential Energy is transformed into Kinetic Energy, but none is lost. And since there is no torque when the Angular Momentum is calculated about the center of the planet, the angular momentum must be conserved as well. (Both of these statements would not be true if some nonconservative, dissipative Force was present, but we are assuming motion through empty space, and a fall onto a surface with no atmosphere.)We write the conditions for the initial state (when the mass is very far from the planet) with subscript i and for the final state (when the mass comes down and just grazes the planet tangentially) by the subscript f.

The mass of the meteor is m. That of the planet is M. The initial distance between the center of the planet and the meteor is ri. The final disttance is the radius of the planet, R.

The magnitude of the initial angular momentum is

Latex
\begin{large}\[ L_{i} = mv_{i}b \]\end{large}

The initial Energy is

Latex
\begin{large}\[ E_{\rm total} = KE + PE \]\end{large}


Latex
\begin{large}\[ E_{\rm initial\;total} = \frac{1}{2}m{v_{i}}^{2} - \frac{mMG}{r} \]\end{large}

The final angular momentum is

Latex
\begin{large}\[ L_{f} = mv_{f}R \]\end{large}

And the final Energy is

Latex
\begin{large}\[ E_{\rm final\;|

|!636px-Jupiter_showing_SL9_impact_sites.jpg!|
|Jupiter, showing the impact marks from fragments of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 in July 1994
Photo from Wikimedia Commons. Original by Hubbel Space Telescope Comet Team and NASA|


{composition-setup}{composition-setup}

{excerpt:hidden=true}Calculation of Effective Cross-Section of a planet with Gravity{excerpt}

Because [gravity] will act to pull meteors, comets, and other space debris toward a planet, the effective cross-section for a planet to capture an object is larger than its geometrical cross-section. What is the size of this effective cross-section in terms of the physical qualities of the planet and the situation? What features of the impacting body is it independent of?

h4. Solution

{toggle-cloak:id=sys} *System:*  {cloak:id=sys}[Point particle] subject to [gravity] but moving with constant [angular momentum].{cloak}

{toggle-cloak:id=int} *Interactions:*  {cloak:id=int}[Gravity].{cloak}

{toggle-cloak:id=mod} *Model:* {cloak:id=mod} XXXXX.{cloak}

{toggle-cloak:id=app} *Approach:*  

{cloak:id=app}

{toggle-cloak:id=diag} {color:red} *Diagrammatic Representation* {color}

{cloak:id=diag}

The Force Diagram of the Meteor approaching the Planet

|Force Diagram of Meteor and Planet|

The [single-axis torque] about the center of the planet is zero, because the force of [gravity] acts along the same direction as the radius *r*. About this point, therefore, [angular momentum] is conserved.

|Sketch showing Torque|

{cloak:diag}

{toggle-cloak:id=math} {color:red} *Mathematical Representation* {color}

{cloak:id=math}

We can calculate the effective Capture Radius *b* by setting this as the distance the path of the mass is displaced from one running through the center of the planet for the situation where the mass just touches the surface of the planet at its closest approach. The offset between the path of the object and the center of the planet is usually called the _impact parameter_, and we are looking for its critical value. Once we have it, we can turn it into a cross-section for capture by squaring it and multiplying by π . 

We begin by recognizing that both Energy and Angular Momentum (about the planet's center) are conserved. Some of the object's potential Energy_ is transformed into _Kinetic Energy_, but none is lost. And since there is no torque when the Angular Momentum is calculated about the center of the planet, the angular momentum must be conserved as well. (Both of these statements would not be true if some nonconservative, dissipative [Force] was present, but we are assuming motion through empty space, and a fall onto a surface with no atmosphere.)We write the conditions for the _initial_ state (when the mass is very far from the planet) with subscript *i* and for the _final_ state (when the mass comes down and just grazes the planet tangentially) by the subscript *f*.

{latex}\begin{large}\[ \vec{\tau} = \vec{r} X \vec{F} = rF = I_{\rm total} \alpha \]\end{large}{latex}


{latex}\begin{large}\[ I_{\rm total} = I_{\rm small} + I_{\rm large} \]\end{large}{latex}


{latex}\begin{large}\[ I = \frac{1}{2}m r^2 \] \end{large}{latex}



{latex}\begin{large}\[ I_{\rm total} = \frac{1}{2}(m r^2 + M R^2 )m{v_{f}}^{2} - \frac{mMG}{R} \]\end{large}{latex}





{latex}

Equating the two expressions for angular momentum gives


Latex
\begin{large}\[ \omegamv_{\rm i}b = mv_{f}R \]\end{large}


Latex
\begin{large}\[ v_{f} = \frac{b}{R}v_{i} \]\end{large}

Inserting this into the expression for the final Energy, and equating the initial and final energies gives, after some algebra:

Latex
= \omega_{\rm i} + \alpha (t_{\rm f} - t_{\rm i}) \] \end{large}{latex}



{latex}\begin{large}\[ \theta_{\rm f} b = R\theta_sqrt{\rm1 i} + \omega_{\rm i} ( t_{\rm f} - t_{\rm i} ) + \frac{1}{2} \alpha ( t_{\rm f} - t_{\rm i} )^2  frac{2MG}{{v_{i}}^{2}}\frac{r_{i}-R}{r_{i}R}} \]\end{large}

In the limit as ri goes to infinity, this becomes

Latex
{latex}


{latex}\begin{large}\[ \omega_{\rm f} b = R\alpha t_{\rm f}\]\end{large}{latex}

{latex}\begin{large}\[ \theta_{\rm f} = \frac{1}{2} \alpha {t_{\rm f}}^2sqrt{1 + \frac{2MG}{R{v_{i}}^{2}}} \]\end{large}{latex}
where
{latex}

The Capture cross-section is then

Latex
\begin{large} \[ Cross \alpha; Section = \fracpi b^{rF}{I_{\rm total}} = \frac{2rF}{mr^2 + MR^2 }2} = \pi R^{2}\left(1 + \frac{2MG}{R{v_{i}}^{2}}\right) \]\end{large}{latex}

{cloak:math}
{cloak:app}



{td}
{tr}
{table}
{live-template:RELATE license}


Looking either at the value of b or of the Capture Cross Section, we see that it goes toward radius R or area πR2 when the mass M goes to zero, or if G were to magically become zero, or if the initial velocity vi is much larger than MG .

On the other hand, the value of b (and of the Capture Cross Section) increases as the gravitational force of the planet increases (that is, as MG gets larger).

An unexpected result is that the value of b increases if MG remains the same but the value of vi decreases. When the initial velocity is zero, b becomes infinite, meaning that the meteor must invariably fall into the planet.

(Of course, this result assumes a universe consisting solely of a motionless meteor and a motionless planet, and nothing else. As soon as we add other masses, or any relative velocity, the result is different.)


Finally, note that the end result is completely independent of the mass of the meteor m . The Capture Cross-Section is the same for any mass falling into the planet at initial velocity vi .

Cloak
math
math

Cloak
app
app

Wiki Markup
{html}
<script type="text/javascript">
var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
try {
var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-11762009-2");
pageTracker._trackPageview();
} catch(err) {}</script>
{html}