...
If we were to redo the project, there would be a few things we would could improve on. We could have spent more time in the earlier design phases of the project. We borrowed a lot of usability tools and design techniques were preexisting website. This is a good thing because users are immediately familiar with some parts of our UI, but these choices are not optimized for our tasks and is not too impressive or revolutionary.
-If we could do it again, what would we do differently?
-Focus in this part not on the specific design decisions of your project (which you already discussed in the Design section), but instead on the meta-level decisions about your design process: your risk assessments, your decisions about what features to prototype and which prototype techniques to use, and how you evaluated the results of your observationsWe also could have put more thought into the organization of data. Currently we are confined by the categories of Justin.tv, our source of streams, which these categories can be limiting and inefficient in some use cases. Lastly, our stream player is the generic embed player from Justin.tv, so it is designed for Justin.tv's websites. Because of this, its usability features do not completely complement StreamBrowser, and we should have thought about how to better integrate it into our interface.