...
Given the conservative 10% target for coverage, clear thought must be given to maximizing the influence of each protected unit of ocean. We again emphasize that it is not the size of individual sanctuaries that is the most important matter, but rather the global scale of coverage (Guenétte , et . al., 2003).
There are several general principles that should be followed when selecting locations for marine reserves. To properly function as a buffer against external exploitation, the 10% of ocean area must include a globally representative sample of habitats and ecosystems (Ballantine 1991). Particular emphasis should be placed on protecting especially fragile, unique, or threatened ecosystems. Furthermore, when possible, multiple, discrete examples of each habitat type should be protected to insure against localized disturbances. Finally, individual Marine Reserves marine reserves should be set up in mutually reinforcing networks to maximize their collective influence. The proper layout of such systems relies heavily on accurate knowledge of the physical processes in a given area, especially the activity of advective and convective current systems, and the biological responses to such physical factors (Johnson, Funicelli, & Bohnsack 1999 and Ballantine 1991). As such, continual refinement of such data through future research is very important to effective placement of the Marine Reservesmarine reserves.
Although the Nono-Take Zones take zones in this proposal are intended to primarily target entire ecosystems, we acknowledge that there are biological or economic situations in which a certain organism species is of particular importance. In such cases, an a thorough understanding of the relevant biology and ecology is critically important. For For example, a very mobile fish population would have a faster biomass exchange rate through a Marine Reservemarine reserve, rendering it less effective than it would be for a less mobile species. As such, no-take zones are best placed along the axis of movement for given populations. This configuration maximizes the time the fish will remain within the reserve and hence the protective effect. (Watson, Alder, Walters, 2000)
Further difficulties arise when marine reserves are used to protect highly migratory species. It would be inefficient and controversial to try to place a reserve over the entire migration path of a population. One possibility is a configuration that targets key life states and/or migratory routes of the target species (Robichaud & Rose 2004). A land-based analogy is the protection of bird nesting sites and reserves for migratory birds, respectively. Another option is the implementation of dynamic protected areas. By continuously tracking indicators of fish population, such as ocean fronts, the boundaries can be changed to follow populations. With However, we do acknowledge that an ever - changing boundary , however, confusion as to the exact location of the MPA can arisecan give rise to significant confusion. (Hyrenbach, Worm, Fonteneau, Gilman, 2007)
...
This vast array of considerations can seem daunting. The optimal layout of Marine Reserves marine reserves must consider numerous biological, physical, and social factors, as well as the very practical issues of cost and enforceability. Fortunately, there exist several sophisticated environmental modeling packages such as Marxan (Possingham, Ball, & Andleman 2000), ResNet, and C-Plan that use stochastic statistical methods to optimize these many parameters. Naturally, these types of algorithms are only as accurate good as the input data put into them, so continued emphasis on the collection of scientific data is essential to the optimal design, and hence eventual success of Marine Reservesmarine reserves.
Figure 1. Graphic depicting possible marine protected areas, map data courtesy of Google Maps.
[WEBTEAM: Please Hyperlink to external "FURTHER RESEARCH PAGE" with text, "For more on oceanographic research"]
[WEBTEAM: Please Provide hyperlink back to 10% Plan Page...] Wiki Markup