With the onset of the many The introduction of new rules and regulations we propose, the livelihood will undoubtedly have an impact on the livelihoods of fishermen and other members of the fishing communities are undoubtedly at stake. Implementing quotas or community.  Quotas, taxes, technological regulations, and marine protected areas may will all restrict the freedom fishermen 's freedom to fish and an the elimination of subsidies or restricting technology may will likely increase the costs . It should of fishing.  Nevertheless, it must be noted , however, that the regulations proposals of Mission 2011 proposes are not aimed at destroying the fishing industry -- because we, too, realize the importance of fish in our own lives and that many of us are not necessarily willing to revert switch to a fish-free diet ourselves -- but rather, to begin a transition from depleting fish stocks to sustainable fishing sustaining them.  This transition is necessary in order to secure the supply of fish and success of the fishing industry in the years and decades to come.

That said, a change from the status quo is inevitable, and there is no solution .  There are no solutions to the problems facing global fisheries problem that does do not involve reducing the number of fish that is are caught, and, in turn, reducing the number of people who make a living through the fishing industry.  Just as workers in the auto automotive industry have been displaced by machines, the abacus upgraded to the calculator, and lead in gasoline replaced with hydrocarbons, some fishermen will need to leave the industry and seek a new occupation in the long runhas been replaced by computers, and leaded gasoline has been phased out in order to accommodate catalytic converters (Lovei, 1998), circumstances will force some fishermen to leave the industry over time. Even without the regulations we are suggesting, declining fish stocks mean that fishing can never be as profitable as it was in the past due to declining fish stocks.  Communities centered around fishing need to adapt to a system that limits fishing , or else risk a sudden, irreparable economic downturn that will result if when the remaining fish population collapsespopulations collapse.

 It It should also be noted , that if our plans proposals are carried out and successfully achieve our their goals, then the fishing industry will ultimately benefit from these restrictions. In .  While fishermen may be hurt in the initial stages fisherman will undoubtedly be hurt by many of the restrictions. Howeverof implementation, over the long run, as populations return to and are sustained at more natural levels, there will be more fish that can be harvested without the fishery threatening to risk of population collapse.  On the other hand, if fishing continues as it is being done now, populations will go economically extinct, experience commercial extinction and entire fisheries will be lost .unmigrated-wiki-markup(Munro, 2006).

The plans in this section \[WILL ATTEMPT TO (but maybe actually will, once there's CONTENT on this page)\] address the struggling fishermen who descend from a line of fishermen, the vessel operators and meat processors, cities and towns that rely heavily on profits from fishing, the islands that have few alternatives, and entire nations whose cultures are heavily integrated with the fishing industry.

Fishermen: Livelihood

The There are four options for fishermen:

• Job retraining for a new career
• Research
• Transition to sustainable fishing
• Unemployment

Image Added
Photo courtesy of Jose Cabal-Ugaz

Alternative Employment

Mission has compiled several options to provide fishermen , who will be (or already are) displaced by our proposed solution , with employment opportunities in their field of expertise: the sea.

• tagging fish
• collecting data
• becoming onboard observers

Our proposed tax scheme relies heavily on collecting accurate and comprehensive data about the ecological systems of the ocean. Many researchers will be needed to collect the data necessary for setting the tax level in each region and for each population. Fishermen, with their experience and knowledge of the

...

sea, could be given the chance to apply their knowledge towards research and data collection.

A precedent for onboard observation of vessels already exists. In sections 201 and 403 of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the United States requires that craft must have onboard observers for fishing expeditions within its exclusive economic zone. These observers are federal employees, with formal training in "collecting and analyzing the information necessary for the conservation and management (of fisheries)," "science and statistical analysis," and "basic vessel safety" (NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service, 2007).

The EU also suggests onboard observers, but currently these observers are not mandatory and are paid for by the fishermen themselves and not by the government, creating a conflict of interest. We propose creating programs, in states most effected by this unemployment issue (not on an international scale, however, because not all countries will be affected equally by the fallout of fishery unemployment), that mandate onboard observers for fishing vessels. This program should be run through the national government so that no conflict of interest arises. In a report on the ACP-EU fisheries, the CTA and Commonwealth Secretariat suggested a model for the program: "On board observer programmes should be compulsory (ensuring that no possibilities exist for circumvention). Observers should be paid through a public fund (to which EU ship owners should contribute); and not directly by the boat owner. Observers should be qualified to the same level of competence ("brevet"), ensuring the same level/quality of observership for all FPAs" (Gorez, 2003).

Transitional Subsidies

Transitional Subsidies (check if this matches with the subsidies in the other part of the solution)

Part of our solution calls for subsidizing encouraging the transition to sustainable fisheries. In this case, select Hence, we propose that the fishermen who choose to progress fishing technique and abide by the proposed Agreement could pursue more environmentally friendly fishing techniques should be the ones to qualify for government subsidies.

Currently, the U.S. Magnuson-Stevens Act allocated allocates funds to porgrssive fisheries, and when fisheries committed to changing their practices. When fisheries in a given locale fail to improve, those funds are reallocated to others that are improving. Similar   Such programs like this encourage fishermen to abide by the laws of the sea (CITATION NEEDEDNOAA National Marine Fisheries Service, 2007).

Elimination of Days at Sea

Many areas have implemented a Days-at-Sea program to restrict the number of days a year fishermen are allowed to take out their boats (Kesich & Bell, 2007). Proponents reason that reducing the time fishermen spend fishing, and thus the number of fish that are caught, will slow the depletion of fish stocks. This has dealt a severe blow to the industry, however, and left many fishermen frustrated and out of work. In Massachusetts, the Days-at-Sea program has cost the fishing industry $22 million. In response, Senators John Kerry and Edward Kennedy have pushed for a bill that will allot appropriate $15 million in financial aid for fishermen (Maguire, 2007). Earlier this yearDespite these problems, in 2007, the New England Fishery Management Council ruled voted to continue the Days-at-Sea program, because a better management alternative was not proposed in time (Kesich & Bell, 2007).

The disadvantages of using Days at Sea as a regulation method for fisheries can been seen in the reaction of Scottish prawn and whitefish fisherman to the December 2006 decision of the Council of Ministers to reudce the number of days at sea by seven to ten percent.  Since 2000, the Scottish whitefish fleet had already been cut by 65% and requirements for smaller mesh sizes had already been implemented.  The additional implementation of the new Days at Sea policy angered fishermen even more.  As MP Alex Salmond, leader of the Scottish National Party, said, "The one glimmer on the horizon is that next year Scotland has the opportunity to elect the first pro-fishing government in Scottish history" (The Buchan Observer, 2006). This only further illustrates the lack of success Days at Sea has and the fierce opposition it generates towards fishing policies in general.

We propose that the Days at Sea program be terminated and the fishery management rely strictly on quotas insteadon the solutions detailed in other sections of this report, including quotas.

Island Nations and Implications

By advocating the reduction of the consumption of fish in the standard diet, one of the most immediate effects would be felt by Advocating a reduction in fish consumption will most immediately affect island states around the world. Many small island nations depend almost exclusive exclusively on fish for food - but and more importantlyspecifically, as a source of protein (Natural Resources Management and Environment Department, 1996). Therefore, measures should be taken to support ease the transition of these island states from relying entirely on fish for protein and energy to subsistence on other sources of food.

One of the most immediate transitions would be from a fish-based food production to a more agriculturallyland-based food production. Island nations have generally been weak in the terms of unable to embrace large-scale, traditional agriculture due to several issues: rampant urbanization, flourishing tourism, and a paucity of large-scale arable land. However, island states have proven to be successful at the cultivation of successfully cultivated crops such as  tropical fruits, tubertubers/root cropsvegetables, nuts and spices, vegetables, and cut flowers (FAO, 1999).  Moreover, organic farming may be introduced to these small island states, and since organic produce may potentially provide investment and revenue value for to these nations. The FAO should offer financial and technical assistance to sustain growth in these areas of development agriculture (Special Ministerial ConferenceFAO, 131999).

When the FAO offers assistance to these island nations, the revenue generated from the sale of these locally produced agricultural products may can be used to purchase or exchange agricultural products with other nations (protein alternatives such as soybeans)acquire alternative sources of protein form other nations, reducing the demands demand of these island nations for a constant supply of fish to satisfy protein and energy needs. Furthermore, this exchange of food resources may also increase the diversity of the local diet, increasing improving the nutritional benefits nutrition of the local population.

In addition, since many of these island nations depend on tourism for the generation of revenue, these island nations inevitably would have to import food to feed their tourists. For example, Caribbean island nations imported $2.3 billion of food products annually to feed their tourists, while generating a negative trade deficit of $0.45 billion (Plan of Action Project). Therefore, the tourism sector should pick out more of the bill, perhaps moving the costs over to the tourists. In essence, these island nations are generating debt in return for tourism, and tourism is not helping the nation (even placing the nation further into the food problem). Thus, tourism should be friendly to the welfare of these island states and generate mutual benefits, rather than polarizing the economic circumstances of these island nations. With aid from the tourism industry and the FAO in promoting local agricultural projects, the small island nations may reduce dependence on fish as a source of protein and look for other alternatives.

...

Japan: A Special Case

Japan is an especially tough country in which to implement our solutions for the following reasons:

1. The Japanese have a culture deeply embedded rooted in fish consumption, with a seafood per capita consumption of 70 kg per year (Kakuchi, 2003) and several . Also, there are many fishing villages ' whose traditional customs surrounding are intimately related to whaling and fish consumptions ("Japan defends whaling 'tradition'," 2007). They currently consume a total of 6.5 million tons of biomass per year, the second largest of any nation  ("Japan - Fishing").consumption (Associated Press, 2007).
2. Japan, with a small land area, has already maximized its terrestrial food production, including a widespread aquaculture program totaling 1.5 million tons of biomass per year, or 30% of their total ingested biomass  ("Japan - Fishing"biomass (Encyclopedia of Nations, 2007).
3. Japan is extremely resistant to international methods pressure to reduce fishing . Currently, Japan is set to ignore and whaling: in 2006, the Sydney Morning Herald announced that Japan had hidden over US$2 billion worth of tuna, far exceeding their catch limits (Darby, 2006). Very recently, Japan announced its intention flout the International Whaling Commission (IWC) ban moratorium on whaling and target the killing of 1000+ whales ("Japan defends whaling 'tradition'," 2007) . It also is reported to physically deter plans to kill nearly 1000 whales (Associated Press, 2007).  Japan is also reported to interfere with attempts by ecological organizations to intervene with in its methods   ("Japan's Whaling Fleet Sails Despite International Censure," affairs (Enc 2007).

In order to reach Japan, we intend to employ positive aspects of Japan, notablyJapan has shown these tendencies and trends in the past:

1. Japan is able to conscientiously and unilaterally proceed towards a national goal as exemplified by its quick modernization  modernization ("Japan :: The Modernization of Japan (1853-1905) ")Japan, 2007).
2. Japan does not appear to be disregarding the value of maintaining its fisheries; it appears to be forming an independent opinion as to the state of its fisheries and disregarding all other estimates, especially in the case of the whaling ban. When the IWC imposed its ban on whaling, Japan initially disagreed; however, after further research, they decided to agree ("International Whaling Commission "). Currently, they believe that certain whale species have returned to sustainable levels, and disregard levels where a sustainable harvest is possible.  Hence, Japan disregards the IWC as being being too environmentally zealous ("Japan's Whaling Fleet Sails Despite International Censure," Enviornment News Service, 2007).

Therefore, we propose collaboration and mutual research between the UN and Japan to maintain Japan's fisheries; we hope to reach a commonly acceptable level of for sustainable fishing that does not contradicting contradict international levelsstudies. This research should be done as objectively as possible, and on a UN-regulated regular basis in order to expedite a common solution.

...

.

...

Cultural Implications

Any solution to overfishing must take into account the cultural implications that it will have to those cultures focused around fish. Perhaps more important however, is the fact that certain cultures are fueling the problem of overfishing.

The example of green sea urchin harvesting off East Petpeswick, Nova Scotia is very pertinent. The green sea urchins were considered "trash fish" by the Canadian and U.S.American fishermen, and thus populations were allowed to live remain above sustainable fishing levels. However, the realization that urchin roe was a valuable Japanese delicacy instigated a frenzied race for urchins. Indeed, in In the early 1990's1990s, it became apparent that urchin populations would begin to be overfished as well, because once a few divers found a good spot, many other fishermen would show up almost immediatelysoon be depleted.

Thus, a key aspect in solving overfishing is stopping the fuel recognizing that culture is providing for overfishing, and a vital component to this is using education. Indeed, we can look to Scotlandfor an example to make delicacies more prestigious.  The Scottish White Fish Producers' Assocation is looking into can often drive overfishing.  Cultures must be educated to recognize the damage they are inflicting on the oceans and be informed about what they can do to limit this damage.  In Scotland, once the problem of overfishing was recognized, the Scottish Whitefish Producers' Association began the process if applying for Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) accreditation, "a prestigious international charter mark," for their fishery of haddock and langoustines.  As EU European Union Environment secretary Secretary Richard Lochhead said, "The MSC standard means consumers can buy fish with confidence - knowing that these stocks are being fished sustainably." (need to properly cite in-text http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/news/display.var.1852609.0.0.php)\\^{Image Removed}Kesich & Bell, 2007). This success story is an encouraging sign.

It is not only wealthy developed nations that have reacted to overfishing. We can look to the example of the Maldives to see a small island nation that realized the dire condition of its fish stocks and took responsive action. The Maldives is an archipelago of nearly 1200 coral islands where fisheries account for 11% of the GDP, 20% of employment, and 74% of the country's export commodities (FAO, 1999). The country's dependence on fisheries has led it to develop sustainable fisheries for various species including the giant clam. The government was quick to respond to potential overexploitation of the giant clam by banning its export, even though this action decreased profits for the people of the Maldives over the short term (FAO, 1999).

It is essential to clearly demonstrate the state of the global fisheries to countries and cultures that rely heavily on fish, a task which the educational component of our solution hopes to achieve. If these countries and cultures can be encouraged to take the initiative on sustainability issues, our solution has the potential to be very effective.

Completed, correct citations

Darby, A. (12 August 2006). Revealed: how Japan caught and hid $2b worth of rare tuna. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved November 23, 2007, from: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2006/08/11/1154803102432.html

Enviornment News Service. (2007, November 20). Japan's whaling fleet sails despite international censure. International Daily Newswire. Retrieved November 22, 2007, from http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/nov2007/2007-11-20-01.asp

Associated Press. (2007, November 18). Japan defends whaling 'tradition'. CNN. Retrieved November 22, 2007, from http://edition.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/11/18/japan.whale.ap/

Kakuchi, S. (2003, June 28). Japan's fishing industry in peril. Asia Times. Retrieved November 22, 2007, from http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Japan/EF28Dh03.html

Natural Resources Management and Environment Department. (1996). Fisheries and food security. Rome: FAO Corporate Document Depository. Retrieved November 23, 2007 from http://193.43.36.103/DOCREP/x0262e/x0262e09.htm

Lovei, Magda. (1998). The World Bank technical paper No. 397 phasing out lead from gasoline (Electronic version). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Munro, Margaret. (2006). 2050 the year of no more fish, scientists warn. CanWest News Service. Retrieved November 23, 2007, from http://www.canada.com/topics/news/world/story.html?id=3b78aea6-3ce6-4e2b-a840-5d610d944f74&k=50888

Kesich, G.D. & Bell, T. (2007, June 22). " Fishery council keeps limits on days at sea. " Portland Press Herald. Retrieved November 18, 2007, from http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/story.php?id=116294&ac=PHnws

Maguire, K. (2007, October 23). " U.S. denies request to aid fishermen. " The Boston Globe. Retrieved November 18, 2007, from
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2007/10/23/us_denies_request_to_aid_fishermen/

Rejobbing and Retraining

As of 2004, there are approximately 38,000 people working as fishermen in the United States, making between $322 and $775 a week.

http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos177.htm
http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos177.htm

 Small Island States

Small Island Developing States Food And Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (1999). "Special Ministeral Conference On Agriculture in Small Developing States." Food And Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2003.  (Electronic version). FAO.

Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. (2000). "Plan of Action Project action project for Agriculture agriculture in the Small Developing Nations." Food and Agricultural Organizations of the United Nations, 2000small developing nations. Mexico: FAO. Retrieved November 21, 2007, from http://www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/X4444E.htmInternational Whaling Commission . Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

. Retrieved November 22, The Buchan Observer. (2006, December). Days-at-sea restrictions a major blow for Scots fleet. The Buchan Observer. Retrieved November 21 2007, from http://enwww.buchanie.wikipediaco.orguk/archived/wiki2006/International_Whaling_Commissionweek_52/news/fishfleet.asp

Encyclopedia of Nations. (2007). Japan - fishing. Author. Retrieved Noember Japan - Fishing. Retrieved November 22, 2007, from http://www.nationsencyclopedia.com/Asia-and-Oceania/Japan-FISHING.html

Japan :: The Modernization of Japan (1853-1905. (2007). Britannica In Student's Encyclopedia. Retrieved November 2224, 2007, from Britannica Student Encyclopedia: http://student.britannica.com/comptons/article-203219/Japan Japan defends whaling 'tradition'

Gorez, B. (20072003). CNN ACP EU fisheries relations: towards greater sustainability. Brussels: CTA. Retrieved November 22, 2007, from http://editionhdl.cnnhandle.comnet/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/11/18/japan.whale.ap/Japan's Whaling Fleet Sails Despite International Censure1834/891

NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service. (2007). Enviornment News Service. Retrieved November 22, 2007, from http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/nov2007/2007-11-20-01.aspKakuchi, S. (2003). Japan's fishing industry in peril. Asia Times. Retrieved November 22, 2007, from http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Japan/EF28Dh03.html The Magnuson-Stevens fishery conservation and management act (Electronic Version). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.