Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Corrected links that should have been relative instead of absolute.

...

  • GIRs are red, course requirements are green. While, functionally speaking, the colors make no difference, picking colors not linked for colorblindness in 5-7% of the male population might be better. 

Reflection

The iterative design process was really helpful in making many of our design decisions and narrowing our scope.  Through talking with many users, MIT students, we were able to find out what they cared about and what they were interested in in a four-year planner.

Our initial design, we quickly realized, was too large in scope.  We wanted to create a four-year planner, then allow users to create their schedule for the current semester, and finally share their schedule with friends.  We quickly realized that when people wanted a four-year planner, they care less about these other features, and thus we narrowed our scope to just a four-year planner that would be easy to use and learn.

Throughout our process, we continuously went through friends to help us make some design decisions for our projects.  We would ask questions like "what kind of interaction would you want?" and many other questions to get feedback that would help us through our design.

From our paper prototypes, heuristic evaluations, and our user testings we saw flaws in what we thought was intuitive was actually not for the average user.  From our paper prototype, we kind of mentioned the feedback that would happen from their actions, making it appear a bit like magic.  When it came time to implement these in our prototype, we quickly saw that it would not be as easy as we thought and not as intuitive for why these things would occur.  Our heuristic evaluations helped us see flaws in some of our design.  We got answers to questions we had like "Does it make sense to press this button to get information, or to return the class?"  Lastly, our user testing showed us some things that we took for granted.  Because undergraduates are used to using Course Numbers, we used this "shortcut" everywhere when referencing a class, sometimes forgetting about the class name which is equally important especially for classes that you do not know of or about.

If we had to re-do our project, I do not think we would have changed our process too much.  The work we did to get feedback from users and friends was invaluable and greatly helped shape our design.  As we completed our deliverable though, we did not get to implement everything exactly as we had hoped, and maybe we should have gotten feedback on what was most important to represent for the usability of the project.