Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin

June  14, 2011

Phone bridge : number 617-324-7520 , time 5:00 pm to 6:30pm

Agenda:  

  1. Run 9 Production blog  - Justin
  2. Theory Calcs Appearing as Completed (link) - Joe

June  7, 2011

Phone bridge : number 617-324-7374 , time 5:00 pm to 6:30pm

Agenda:  

  1. Run 9 Production - Joe/Justin
  2. Run 9 SN v1.2 - Justin
  3. Run 9 Paper - Joe
    1. Draft Figures - blog
  4.  

...

    Draft Users Meeting Talk - Justin

April  19, 2011

Phone bridge : number 617-452-2163 , time 5:00 pm to 6:30pm

Agenda:  

  1. Run 11 - What did we get? - Jan
  2. Run 9 reproduction/embedding - Joe/Justin 
  3. AOB

March  22, 2011

Phone bridge : number 617-324-7374, time 5:00 pm to 6:30pm , 10 lines

present: Bernd,Jan,Pibero,Justin,Evan,Anselm, Scott,Gene

Agenda:  

  1. Prospects of physics outcome from run 11 Ws.  
    1. W AN   theory prediction, sensitivity - Justin , An is large  (and changes sign) at the ET of half of W mass, where we run rapidly out of yield.  
    2. FOM for AN w/ run 11 stats - Jan , 500 events would allow to measure AN*P with accuracy of 0.06 (=1 sigma)
    3. Ws in the Endcap?
  2. Run 9 W x-section  paper ?
    1. is paper really done and we await for efficiency from embedding?
    2. STAR library with fixes is not tagged yet, we want to use it for re-production and new embedding
    3. Dmitry improved DB so may be Justin will be able to run all jobs at once.
  3. RUN 12 BUR (Mid-rapidity / Forward rapidity) Expected LT, P as in run 11. We need achievable physics goal measurement.
  4. AOB

March  8, 2011

Phone bridge : number 617-452-2163, time 5:00 pm to 6:30pm , 10 lines

present: 

Agenda:  

  1. Update on SL09g/SL10j comparison - Joe
    1. Change in DB that causes loss of tracks is found - link
    2. What do we want to do now? Reproduce? Both production and embedding? Can we use cloud?
  2. Update on W Embedding - Justin
    1. W- : done  movie
    2. W+: done  movie
    3. Z->ee : done
    4. W->tau : few days left
  3. AOB

March  1, 2011

Phone bridge : number 617-452-2163, time 5:00 pm to 6:30pm , 10 lines

present: 

Agenda:  

  1. Update on SL09g/SL10j comparison - Joe
    1. One line of code causes a problem 
    2. But its not the whole story
  2. Update on W Embedding - Justin
  3. AOB

February  22, 2011

Phone bridge : number 617-324-7520, time 5:00 pm to 6:30pm , 10 lines

present: 

Agenda:  

  1.  Update on SL09g/SL10j comparison - Joe
  2. First 100 Ws @ STAR reconstructed  on the Cloud - Jan + Justin + STAR & Magellan Computing teams
    1. Movies W in BEMC , one Z in BEMC

February  15, 2011

Phone bridge : number 617-324-7520, time 5:00 pm to 6:30pm , 10 lines

present: Justin, Hal, Joe, Scott, Evan, Gene, Jan

Agenda:  

  1.  Status of TPC calib: Gene, Joe. New SC & GL in official DB as of day 46, ZDC seems to count less by ~20% 
  2. EMC status - Justin
  3. L2 malloc() problem - Joe. Is  solved 
  4. Ws in the barrel found so far page 13:  PDF , separated by day: 42 , 44 , 45 - Jan
  5. VMs processing data taken today load
  6. Idea of 'W from the Cloud' daily updating page ? Cons seems to weight over pros.
  7.  long vs. trans switch - change of plans?
  8. ongoing data related tasks to be taken, as shown last week drupal blog^http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/20243/ , Evan will start working on bXing offset vs. run.
  1. AOB

February  8, 2011

Phone bridge : number 617-452-5208  , time 5:30 pm (30 minutes later)  to 6:30pm , 10 lines

present: Gene, Justin, Scott, jan

Agenda:  focus on run 11 Ws; goal AL paper in reading by spin PWG in the Fall'11:

  1. Identified tasks: http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/20243/ - Jan
  2. Status of TPC calibration + beam line constrain - Gene## preliminary in place: T0, TPC gain by Tonko online follow ramp with some latency, DV, beam line, SC & GL taken form run 9 pp500## work on better : beam line, big task SC & GL  following Joe's work w/ ZDC rate as input - needs evaluation, are ZDC the same?## Lower HV to 1100 V  TPC gain will reduce by 30%, MIP should be still visible, efficiency should not deteriorate## gains between pads needs to be redone with new HV## low lumi fill wil be request   
  3. Status of EMC calibration - Justin
  4. Status of production on VM - Jan#* resources:  cores, local disk, permanent disk - sufficient  
    • protocol: not fully functional
      • Works: automatic writing daq files from RCF HPSS to rcf data13/, processing of single daq file on VM including I/O to host (carver)
      • in commissioning : reliable DB update on VM, bulk file transfer to NERSC w/ gsiftp
      • on the drawing board: transporting muDst back to RCF, sinking in HPSS, registering muDst with the file catalog
  1. Status of 2011 W-algo , E+B, W, Z - Justin## writes W-tree, ## Endcap W-code: needs track & cluster## Endcap Z-code : 1 track & cluster in B + cluster in E (no need for  track)
  2. Analysis of day 37 - Jan: W-barrel 'movie' for run 12037063
    # AOB

January 18, 2011

Phone bridge : number 617-452-2163  , time 5pm to 6:30pm , 10 lines

Agenda:

  1. Status of embedding request - Jan, Justin
  2. New Production - Justin, Jan, Gene
  3. [W Xsec Paper|http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/seelej/2010/oct/26/run9-w-cross-section-paper] - Joe
  4. [W Xsec Analysis Update|http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/xSectionUpdate1.18.11.pdf] - Justin
  5. AOB

January 11, 2011

Phone bridge : number 617-324-7374 , time 5pm to 6:30pm , 10 lines

Present:
Agenda:

  1. Status of embedding request - Jan, Justin
  2. New production - Justin
  3. Paper Rough Draft Released - Joe
  4. AOB

January 4, 2011

Phone bridge : number 617-324-7374, time 5pm to 6:30pm , 10 lines

Present:
Agenda:

  1. Status of embedding request - Jan eval of muDst, Justin
  2. New production - Justin
  3. Paper Status - Joe
  4. SN Status - Justin
  5. AOB## ESMD/EPRS ideas for Endcap W algo - Justin blog

December 14, 2010

Phone bridge : number 617-452-2163, time 5pm to 6:30pm , 10 lines

Present:
Agenda:

  1. Status of embedding request - Jan, Justin
  2. Run11 Prep - All
  3. W kin

December 8, 2010

Phone bridge : number 617-324-7374, time 5pm to 6:30pm , 10 lines

Present:
Agenda:

  1. Status of papers from run 9
    1. W AL
    2. W x-section
      1. paper draft
      2. embedding
  2. Preparation to run 11, pp500
    1. Goals 
      1. acquire LT=100/pb w/ P=50% to tape (is ~20% higher than in BUR, lets balance pressure from IP3)  
      2. plot J-peak charge separated 1 month after W-trigger established
      3. determine AL for W+,-  in the Barrel and Endcap 
      4. publish only AL for W+,- 
      5. do not yield to the pressure of upcoming conferences, rather do the job once and do it right at the first time.
    2. timing in of calos & spin bits 
    3. L0 trigger
    4. L2 tagger 
    5. online monitoring
    6. human run QA concurrent with data taking
      1. revise key words describing problems
      2. generate automatic run list (the big CSV table)
      3. assign names & weeks for human QA, define stick and carrot
    7. preparation to daq files production :  ###  A='dirty' , B='preliminary', C='final'  (w/ support from Jerome)   
      1. time line:  A='near real time', B='end of May' , C='December 2011'
      2.  availability of TPC calibrations : A='2mm', B='as good as in run 9', C='final'
      3. beam line constrain
      4. availability of EMC calibrations: a) E+B towers, b) ESMD, c) anything else
      5. availability of computing resources:  Magellan/Cloud for A,B, RCF for C
      6. availability of disks for muDst :  ~50% on our institutional disks, 50% on RCF, may need to 'see' only half of muDst at given time, the rest on HPSS
      7. availability of manpower to harness the cloud:  Matt,Jan, Iwona(10%), Justin, Jerome is helping a lot
    8. do we need changes/upgrades to the BFC to better utilize Endcap info for tracking? 
    9. Low priority issues (work on those after all the above is in a good shape)
      1. Z-> ee x-section
      2. W A_N from the transverse period , theory talk @ RIKEN https://indico.bnl.gov/materialDisplay.py?contribId=14&sessionId=6&materialId=slides&confId=247
      3.  dbar/ubar from unpol Ws
      4. ZB events & embedding
      5. vernier scan

December 1, 2010

Phone bridge : number 617-324-7374, time 5pm to 7pm , 10 lines

Present:
Agenda:

  1. Wiki Markup<span style="color: #003366">[</span><span style="color: #003366">Dip problem resolved?</span>\[Dip problem resolved?|http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/seelej/2010/nov/23/a-resolution-dip-problem-pp500\]&nbsp;\ - Joe \
    # \ [First look at endcap Ws\|http://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/spin/stevens4/tmp/nov22/endcapW.pdf\]&nbsp;\ - Justin \
    # Embedding and Production Update - All \
    # \ [more about Endcap Ws&nbsp;\Endcap Ws |http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/2009-W-Endcap-varia1.pdf\]h4. *November 9, 2010*

Phone bridge : number 617-324-7374, time 5pm to 7pm , 10 lines

Present:
Agenda:

  1. Paper has been resubmitted!
  2. TPC Calibration - Done! - Joe
  3.  

October 26, 2010

Phone bridge : number 617-324-7374, time 5pm to 7pm , 10 lines
Present:
Agenda:

  1. GPC comments/resubmission to PRL of AL paper  - Bernd
  2. TPC Calibration - Joe
  3. Xsec paper figures - Joe, Scott, Justin
  4. BTOW scale decision - All
  5. AOB
    1. vernier scan note and luminosity numbers posted - Ross

October 19, 2010

Present:

Agenda:

  1. GPC comments/resubmission to PRL of AL paper  - Bernd
  2. BTOW Scale update - Justin
  3. will BSMD help in W reco? - Jan 
  4. Preparation for run11 - Joe
  5. Luminosity Monitoring for run11 - Ross
  6. AOB
    1. Draft DNP talk - Justin

October 12, 2010

Present:
Agenda:

  1. Referee Responses to AL paper  - Bernd
  2. Our first *real* citation  
  3. Ready to start embedding? - Jan, Joe, Justin
  4. Vernier scan note/systematics - Ross 

October 5, 2010

Present:
Agenda:

  1. Referee Responses to AL paper  - Bernd
  2. Update on investigation of BTOW scale: blog

September 14, 2010

Present:
Agenda:

  1.  W x-section paper
    1. Investigating BTOW scale:  E/p stuff  another idea

...

  1. Ongoing data analysis
    1. vernier scan - Ross -nothing
    2. revised background estimate (using signed pT balance cut) - Joe ?
    3. add more ...
  2. Papers
    1. W AL paper home page: PRL ver 1.0 , STAR Note ver 2.00
    2. W x-section paper : where are we?
  3. AOB
  4. upcoming talks during STAR collaboration meetings:
    1. Justin: Junior day
    2. Bernd/Jan: presentation of W AL paper to spin PWG & asking for GPC
    3. Jan : plenary talk on Ws from run 9

March 9, 2010

Phone bridge *number: 617 452 2163* , time 5pm to 6:30 pm , 10 lines
Agenda:

...

Present: Ross, Ilya, Justin,Jan,Scott

  • computing absolute lumi and W xSection. I think it is time to just do it , show, criticize, do it again.
    -newer table of luminosity
    -first look at efficiencies blog
  • theory calculation - lets start to plot it on the xSection
  • QA of non-embedding M-C: ilya drupal
  • update on fill polarization - are we waiting on new values or just on the summary table from Bernd

January 5, 2010

Phone bridge number: 617-452-2163 , time 5pm to 6+pm ,
Agenda

...

  1. TPC - Gene reported slewing correction for clusters is in DB. T0 should be in DB at the end of the week. Then we can ask for re-production of one fill to see if tracking efficiency improved at Z~0
  2. PPV - status of evaluation of SL09b production - no report
  3. Vernier scan - Ross
    • formula computing BBC xsection seems to be complete now. For a low lumi fill in pp500 the computed BBC xsection is 26mb - close to the value know for pp200
    • Q: what do we expect for BBC xsection at 500 GeV - answer is unknown
    • the linear formula can't be applied for regular fills when BBC is saturated, Hal suggested using more advanced approach counting bXings w/o rate, using zero of Poisson distribution. LINK SHOULD BE HERE
    • BHT3 x-section : results of fit with noisy patches removed Conclusion: background reduces but not vanishes. Comparison for other vernier scan will be made, estimation of error in determination of xSection due to non vanishing background will be made
  4. BTOW calibration
    • relative -Joe - link , is completed. Write-up was sent to emc2-hn for comments.
    • absolute -Matt, will be performed shortly using Joe's relative gains.
    unmigrated-wiki-markup
  5. Understanding QCD e+/e\- ratio at ET \ [15,20\] GeV - Scott.
    • Plan: use Pythia events and simplified W-algo to determine the ratio of high pT particles with positive/negative charge.
    • Manpower: not assigned.
  6. Status of W analysis:
    1. Joe detailed presentation of alternative W-algo, run 9 data & M-C - link. Results are consistent with Jan's analysis. 2 independent algos leading to similar output improve confidence in the result.
    2. Jan's ver 4.2 : bug fix, upgrade, answers to questions after last week spin PWG presentation , slides
    3. Justin : using ETOW in W-algo improves S/B in ET~20 GeV region, allows background estimation for di-jets escaping through not existing East endcap.
  7. Layout of paper 1: Draft: Files: Bernd
    Decisions:
    • Bernd will oversee the latex files, complete version will be posted in spin/protected/ area at THIS LOCATION
    • Assigned chapters: Intro+RHIC : Bernd; STAR : Scott; Lumi : Ross; Trigger : Jan
    • We hope to have them written by next week.
  8. Announcements
    • Hal finished run QA for fills: 10403, 10404, 10407, 10412.

...

  1. TPC, Gene:
    • non-linear SC(lumi) should provide TPC track accuracy of 2 mm at both ends of the track. We hope Joe will work on this next week, should take a week.
    • We could also use Gene's PCA method of finding a linear combination of scalers (each at first order).
    • since linear SC(lumi) was tuned to lumi equivalent to ZDC base rate of 70kHz, any pp500 run taken at the ZDC rate has current best TPC calibration. Jan: I'll use it for beam line constrain study, see below.
    • Wiki Markup*beam line constrain* : plan A is Rosi & Jan succeed with 3D beam line fit to global tracks w/o intermediate vertex finding. Here are \ [[Media:Beamline-v3.pdf |details of the algo]\] as intended and not implemented. If this works Gene needs a \ ~day to produce beam line constrain for all 39 fills. Plane B is to use Minuit vertex finder which may require significant stats to overcome jitter due to pileup tracks. In such case we would need to provide manpower for \ ~week long job, Gene would only supervise it. Jan: lets go for plan A.
    • conclusion: once both items are resolved we can ask for production, perhaps 2 weeks from now.
  2. BTOW, ETOW gains - no progress.unmigrated-wiki-markup
  3. BSMD : Willie is working '''slopes for individual strips'''. He run over 10k VPD-minB events and got this \ [[Media:BSMD-strips-Picture 16.png|2D plot of module 119]\] and spectra \ [[Media:BSMD-strips-Picture 15.png |individual strips]\]. The available 1.5M vpd-minB events should be enough to fit every strip. If not we will merge strips.unmigrated-wiki-markup
  4. BSMD geometry: Scott asked how well we know '''relative position of BSMD vs. TPC'''. It is [followed up on emc2-hn |http://www.star.bnl.gov/HyperNews-star/get/emc2/3250/1.html]. <p> Scott once did \ [[Media:Conversions-distace-Scott.pdf &#124; simple calculation for photons that convert to | simple calculation for photons that convert to e+/e&#45; pairs&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;&#124;\||]\] in the SVT, attached. <br>The relevant equation is on the bottom left. For the W -> e, we have r_1 = 0, r_2 = 2.3 m (approximate radius of BSMD planes), and B = 0.5 T. With these numbers, you get the simple relation<br> dPhi (cm) = 40 / pT (GeV)<br>For example, an electron of 40 GeV pT will deflect in the phi direction by 1 cm relative to the same e- of infinite pT. This is probably good to better than a few - pairs||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||\] in the SVT, attached. <br>The relevant equation is on the bottom left. For the W > e, we have r_1 = 0, r_2 = 2.3 m (approximate radius of BSMD planes), and B = 0.5 T. With these numbers, you get the simple relation<br> dPhi (cm) = 40 / pT (GeV)<br>For example, an electron of 40 GeV pT will deflect in the phi direction by 1 cm relative to the same e of infinite pT. This is probably good to better than a few %.
  5. run QA : Scott is working on his fills.

...