You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 14 Next »

Unknown macro: {table}
Unknown macro: {tr}
Unknown macro: {td}
Error formatting macro: live-template: java.lang.NullPointerException
Unknown macro: {td}

Shoemaker-Levy Comet Fragment 9 impacting Jupiter July 22 1994
Photo from Wikimedia Commons by NASA/JPL

Jupiter, showing the impact marks from fragments of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 in July 1994
Photo from Wikimedia Commons. Original by Hubbel Space Telescope Comet Team and NASA

Because [gravity] will act to pull meteors, comets, and other space debris toward a planet, the effective cross-section for a planet to capture an object is larger than its geometrical cross-section. What is the size of this effective cross-section in terms of the physical qualities of the planet and the situation? What features of the impacting body is it independent of?

Solution

System:

Interactions:

Model:

Approach:

Diagrammatic Representation

The Force Diagram of the Meteor approaching the Planet

Force Diagram of Meteor and Planet

The [single-axis torque] about the center of the planet is zero, because the force of [gravity] acts along the same direction as the radius r. About this point, therefore, [angular momentum] is conserved.

Sketch showing Torque

Mathematical Representation

We can calculate the effective Capture Radius b by setting this as the distance the path of the mass is displaced from one running through the center of the planet for the situation where the mass just touches the surface of the planet at its closest approach. The offset between the path of the object and the center of the planet is usually called the impact parameter, and we are looking for its critical value. Once we have it, we can turn it into a cross-section for capture by squaring it and multiplying by π .

We begin by recognizing that both Energy and Angular Momentum (about the planet's center) are conserved. Some of the object's gravitational Potential Energy is transformed into Kinetic Energy, but none is lost. And since there is no torque when the Angular Momentum is calculated about the center of the planet, the angular momentum must be conserved as well. (Both of these statements would not be true if some nonconservative, dissipative force was present, but we are assuming motion through empty space, and a fall onto a surface with no atmosphere.)We write the conditions for the initial state (when the mass is very far from the planet) with subscript i and for the final state (when the mass comes down and just grazes the planet tangentially) by the subscript f.

The mass of the meteor is m. That of the planet is M. The initial distance between the center of the planet and the meteor is ri. The final disttance is the radius of the planet, R.

The magnitude of the initial angular momentum is

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ L_

Unknown macro: {i}

= mv_

b ]\end

The initial Energy is

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ E_

Unknown macro: {rm total}

= KE + PE ]\end


Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ E_

Unknown macro: {rm initial total}

= \frac

Unknown macro: {1}
Unknown macro: {2}

m{v_{i}}^

- \frac

Unknown macro: {mMG}
Unknown macro: {r}

]\end

The final angular momentum is

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ L_

Unknown macro: {f}

= mv_

R ]\end

And the final Energy is

Unknown macro: {latex}

\begin

Unknown macro: {large}

[ E_

Unknown macro: {rm final total}

= \frac

Unknown macro: {1}
Unknown macro: {2}

m{v_{f}}^

- \frac

Unknown macro: {mMG}
Unknown macro: {R}

]\end

Error formatting macro: live-template: java.lang.NullPointerException
  • No labels