Below is the detailed procedure for how the second flight candidate fin can was manufactured. insert more detail
For each step, there is an overview of the process, followed by required materials for this step and then numbered substeps. Some safety notes:
The fin can fits over the motor case (at least, it's supposed to...). Since it didn't quite fit, we sanded the phenolic tube using a flapper wheel, and then overwrapped it with 3 plies of carbon fiber. The phenolic tube acts as insulation from the heat of the motor case and is not structural, so carbon fiber needed to be added to bear the structural loads. During the tube layup, the phenolic tube was held by a pole over the layup jig (much like a pig on a spit). Have at least three people helping with the tube layup.
Required Materials:
Procedure:
Carbon fiber is difficult to work with because it snags and frays easily, so make sure whatever surface you're using is completely cleared off. Also make sure that this surface is large enough for the entire piece of carbon fiber, because the fiber will warp if it overhangs.
| Length (in) | Length + Offset (in) | |
|---|---|---|
| Outer diameter (OD) of tube | ||
| Circumference of phenolic tube (OD x π) | ||
| Length of phenolic tube |
Mark a (INSERT DIMENSIONS) area on the carbon fiber using painter's tape and cut along the tape. It's much easier to cut on tape than cutting the fiber directly, to avoid snags and make sure the dimensions are correct. The dimensions were determined using the table above.
Required Materials:
Did root bond using 5-minute. fin can jig needs to be improved
AFTER root bond, attached phenolic LE to G10 fin core (did after root bond because phenolic wouldn't have fit in the fin can jig)
Root fillet (West Systems fast hardener + colloidal silica)
Says it takes 6 hours to cure, but if you're in a time crunch you can apply a new fillet every 3-4 hours.
Sand fillets
Procedure:
Last year, the tip-to-tip design called for 6 layers of 3 distinct sizes, 2 plies per size. This allowed for a tapering effect on the surface of the fins and the tabs at the top added extra layers above the fins (WHY?)
This first design had much room for improvement, however. The upper tabs going in both directions made aligning the layers more difficult during the layup. To fix this, the upper tabs only extend in one direction such that they are double the width of the fin-to-fin distance. In addition, the fin can extends below the fins themselves so a bottom tab was added to each layer. Another issue was that the taper between layers was too quick, creating actual bumps at each ridge where the layers size changed. To fix this, the design was changed to 6 distinct layers, 1 ply per size, which were offsets of the largest size which covered the entire tip-to-tip surface such that the leading edge and tip edge for each layer are half an inch apart and the trailing edge is a quarter of an inch apart. The final addition was an inch long offset on the largest layer on the tip edge and the trailing edge, the sections which will not have phenolic, to make sure that the fins are completely covered when the last layer is added. These considerations led to the fin design below:
This design was used for the first fin can flight candidate. The layup for this fin can revealed other issues with this design. Firstly, the ridge between the phenolic edge and fins was unfavorable so in the new design, there was no tapering from the leading edge of the fin. In addition, there were some gaps in the carbon fiber between the lower tabs so a half inch tab was added to the lower tab of each layer (tabception). This was to ensure that each layer would meet in that section of the fin. Another issue seen in the layup is that there were sections in the layup with only one layer of coverage, a possible site for improper heat maintenance. To fix this, the second to last layer of the layup is the same shape as the last, only lacking the extra offset on the tip and trailing edge. These changes resulted in the design below:
Further analysis of the design gave three more changes before creating the next fin can. The first was a simple change; the upper tab was made slightly larger, 10.0" instead of 9.8", to make sure that each layer reached the next tab over. Next was the issue of carbon fiber not reaching the phenolic leading edge so as a precaution, the leading edge was offset by a quarter inch on each side. Though this would cause some excess carbon fiber to lie over the phenolic and this excess would need to be cut for each cutout, the extra time in doing so would allow us to cut to exactly the leading edge with the carbon fiber. The last change before the next lay up was the removing the taper on tip edge, mostly because we saw no need for it and only needed to see a smooth taper on the trailing edge, these changes resulted in the design below, the design used in the Hermes 2 Flight Candidate Fin Can #2:
3.1 Carbon Fiber Cut-outs for Tip-to-tip Layup
The carbon fiber cutouts are the pieces of carbon fiber used in the tip-to-tip layup, which consists of laying plies from the tip of one fin, over the tube in between them, over the tip of the next fin (and repeating for the other three sides). The preparation for the tip-to-tip layup involves cutting out squares of carbon fiber and attaching them to wax/parchment paper using spray glue. The purpose of the paper is to prevent the carbon fiber from warping when it is being handled. Then, the actual shapes are cut out using a laser cutter. In general, fiber glass can not be cut on a laser cutter, but carbon fiber can, as long as the fiber is dry (i.e., not "pre-preg", referring to sheets of fiber that have already been impregnated with epoxy). Make sure that whichever laser cutter you use can fit the largest cutouts (the CSAIL laser cutter has a width of 18", too small for the final layer of the tip-to-tip cutouts).
Required Materials:
Procedure:
*Make sure to wear gloves whenever working with/handling carbon fiber, or you will get small splinters that are not painful but very itchy!!
*Using tape, mark squares of carbon fiber (24 squares, 4 for each size cutout, making sure there is enough room to fit the cutout with ~1 inch margin on all sides) using the following table:
| Cutout Number | Dimensions of CF square |
|---|---|
| 1 (smallest size) | 18" x 20" |
| 2 | 18" x 20" |
| 3 | 18" x 20" |
| 4 | 18" x 20" |
| 5 | 18" x 24" |
| 6 (largest size) | 20" x 24" |
Required Materials:
Procedure:
Prepared vacuum bagging materials
Vacuum bag was too big (32" x 38")--> make smaller next time
Waited to cut excess off peel ply, release film and bleeder fabric until started vacc bag
Required Materials:
Procedure:
Mark centerlines on tube and CF cutouts
CF didn't meet up in certain places (ends of tubes, some were barely large enough to cover the fins)
Only had one ply going all the way to the end - saw exposed G10
Triangle of exposed area near the fins --> adjust size of cutouts
Below is a table showing the mass of each cutout size. One of each size was measured, so this is technically not an "average" mass, but we expect that since the laser cutter was used to make the cutouts, the mass of each size is more or less the same.
| Layer Size | Dry mass of one layer |
|---|---|
| 1 (smallest cutout size) | 20g |
| 2 | 22g |
| 3 | 23g |
| 4 | 26g |
| 5 | 33g |
| 6 (largest) | 39g |
| Total mass of all cutouts (6 sizes x 4) | 652g |
For the tip-to-tip layup, we used a total of 6 boats of epoxy. Each boat weighed 118g, not including the mass of the epoxy boat itself, so the total mass of epoxy used for the tip-to-tip layup was 708g.
Required Materials:
Procedure:
Vacuum bag was 32 x 38" (this is TOO BIG, make smaller next time. For the test fin can though the bagging was too SMALL, so find a good middle ground)
Used layup jig to support tube
Make sure to run fingers along fillets so that they don't bunch up and end up with creases after the room temperature cure
Leave vacuum pump on overnight, making sure window is open to avoid vapor build-up
Positioned fin can horizontally as shown, because there wasn't enough vertical space in the oven we used. This may have caused the fins to splay (weight of the tube + epoxy loosening --> fins move), so in the future we should position it vertically. (try taking out the rack, for example)
Check the cure cycle for whatever epoxy you're using. In this case, we used System 3000 High Temp Epoxy, and the cure cycle is detailed below. Note that the epoxy changes from clear to amber-colored after the cure is completed.
Need 2-3 people, not just one person, and do it during the day time!
Cure Cycle for System 3000 epoxy
Required Materials:
Procedure:
Vacuum bagging materials were difficult to remove, but not impossible
Used Dremel to get rid of CF on trailing edge and either end of tube (in future, taper trailing edge of G10 to get smoother layup quality)
Sanded CF on leading edge
