Now, we will talk about the static firing procedures. This is a list of actions that must be followed in the following order:
We will now dive deeper into data collection. There are four main points that need to be taken care of:
Here are two post-firing pictures of a rocket motor to give an idea of how data collection, and more specifically pictures of the motor hardware, can help spot the flaws.
We have established the fact that good firing videos can help understand so much about the firing process. Hence, we shall now consider two main tips to shoot a good firing video and also look at some example firing pictures.
Firstly, a higher frame rate is often more important than a larger resolution, but both are good to have. And secondly, trying to get as many different angles as possible is very important.
After shooting various quality videos and taking pre- and post-firing pictures of the equipment, it is important to know how to diagnose common failures. These consist of overpressurization and thermal failure.
Overpressurization occurs when the propellant produces too high of a chamber pressure, rupturing the motor case. Usually, this happens at the startup unless the design is progressive, or a large void is present.
Thermal failure occurs when the insulation protecting the case from combustion fails and the case melts down. Typically this is seen later in the burn when the temperatures have really been high for a long time. Sometimes this failure seems relatively gentle, and other times it looks just like an overpressurization.
Now, we will briefly talk about data acquisition. This system should be able to sample transducer as quickly as possible, at least 100 hz. Since transducers typically output a very small signal, it has to be amplified and a conversion function from voltage to force or pressure must be found. Also, the transducers should be pre-calibrated over the full range that they will see during the firing.
Our second to last topic is propellant characterization. As we know, burn rate and pressure are proportional, so by doing a series of burns with different throat sizes and fitting a curve to the data, it is possible to experimentally calculate the burn rate as a function of the pressure. This is also a good way to get c*. A minor but important point is that throat diameter before and after the burn should be measured if any slag accumulates.
Lastly, there are some general data processing tasks to do. Comparing maximum and average pressure to the simulated values (so that we can check if the characterization needs to be updated), comparing real thrust trace to the simulated values (so that we can check if they match, and think about if effects like erosive burning can explain discrepancies), calculate ISP and c* (so that we can check whether they are in line with what we expect from the propellant formula), and pass the thrust curve to the simulations team.