The launch version of the Collaboratorium enables members of the Community to vote in two ways:

• Plans
  Members of the Community can select which plan to address climate change they believe is best.

• User posts
  They can also vote on posts in argument maps, to indicate that they believe a particular post is useful and/or insightful.

Future versions of the Collaboratorium may incorporate other mechanisms for enabling group decision making:

• Identification of expert opinion
  In selected areas, the votes and comments of certified experts could be shown separately from the votes and comments of Community members as a whole. For example, the votes and comments of client scientists could be shown separately in sections of the system where their perspectives may be especially valuable or relevant.

• Rating
  Ratings of the prior votes and posts of Community members may be incorporated to allow the Community to identify which users are the most credible.

• Proxy voting
  In proxy voting, Community members can assign their vote on particular issues to a party of their choosing. For example, a Community member might assign their vote on issues related to climate modeling to the IPCC and their vote on issues related to policy to USCAP. Proxy voting is a variation of representative democracy, with voters choosing whichever representative they wish and representation occurring at as fine-grained a level as voters wish.

• Belief aggregation
  This method is used to gauge user’s support for particular plans or particular positions in debates.

Return to What the Collaboratorium is