|
Photo by Lt. Col. Derik Crotts, courtesy of U.S. Army |
Top-fuel dragsters like the one shown above accelerate from rest at a tremendous rate. They race on a straight 1/4 mile long track. From a standing start, they complete the quarter mile in about 4.5 seconds and reach a speed of about 330 mph by the finish line.
Part A
Show that the statistics given in the problem introduction are inconsistent at the 10% level with the assumption that the dragster produces constant acceleration as it moves down the track.
Solution
System:
Dragster as point particle.
Interactions:
External influence from the ground (friction) assumed to produce constant acceleration.
Model:
One-Dimensional Motion with Constant Acceleration.
Approach:
We are asked to prove that the model we are examining does not fit the data. To do so, we look for a contradiction. In this case, we have several ways to find the acceleration, since we have a large number of givens. Choosing our coordinates such that the race begins at xi = 0 and proceeds in the positive x direction, we have:
Unknown macro: {latex}
\begin
Unknown macro: {large}
[ t_
Unknown macro: {i}
= 0][t_
Unknown macro: {f}
=\mbox
Unknown macro: {4.5 s}
][ x_
= 0][x_
Unknown macro: {f}
= \mbox
Unknown macro: {402 m}
][v_
Unknown macro: {i}
= 0][v_
= \mbox
Unknown macro: {148 m/s}
]\end
We now have three separate paths to find the acceleration a. First, we can use:
Unknown macro: {latex}
\begin
Unknown macro: {large}
[ v_
Unknown macro: {f}
= v_
Unknown macro: {i}
+ at ]\end
to give:
Unknown macro: {latex}
\begin
Unknown macro: {large}
[ a = \frac{v_{f}}
Unknown macro: {t}
= \mbox
Unknown macro: {33 m/s}
^
Unknown macro: {2}
]\end
Next, we can use:
Unknown macro: {latex}
\begin
Unknown macro: {large}
[ x_
Unknown macro: {f}
= x_
t + \frac
Unknown macro: {1}
= \frac
]\end
to give:
Unknown macro: {latex}
\begin
Unknown macro: {large}
[ a = \frac{2x_{f}}{t^{2}} = \mbox
Unknown macro: {40 m/s}
^
Unknown macro: {2}
]\end
Finally, we can use:
Unknown macro: {latex}
\begin
Unknown macro: {large}
[ v_
Unknown macro: {f}
^
Unknown macro: {2}
= v_
Unknown macro: {i}
^
+ 2a(x_
-x_
Unknown macro: {i}
) ]\end
to give:
Unknown macro: {latex}
\begin
Unknown macro: {large}
[ a = \frac{v_
Unknown macro: {f}
^{2}}{2x_{f}} = \mbox
Unknown macro: {27 m/s}
^
Unknown macro: {2}
]\end
These accelerations differ from each other by more than 10%, so we conclude that the model is inconsistent at the 10% level.
Part B
Using the fact that a top-fuel dragster will typically weigh 2200 lbs (equivalent to a mass of 1000 kg), show that the assumption that the dragster moves down the track with a constant value for the power delivered to the car in the form of kinetic energy is consistent at (approximately) the 10% level.
Solution
System:
Dragster as point particle.
Interactions:
Friction interacts with the dragster in such a way as to deliver constant power to the dragster's kinetic energy.
Model:
Mechanical Energy, External Work, and Internal Non-Conservative Work.
Approach:
To show that the model is consistent, we need two ways to find the power that rely on different subsets of the given information. The most straightforward way to find the power is to use the velocity and the time, since the Law of Change for our model is:
Unknown macro: {latex}
\begin
Unknown macro: {large}
[ E_
Unknown macro: {i}
+ W^
Unknown macro: {NC}
= K_
+ P^
Unknown macro: {NC}
\Delta t = E_
]\end
Thus, we can write:
Unknown macro: {latex}
\begin
Unknown macro: {large}
[ P^
Unknown macro: {NC}
= \frac{\frac
Unknown macro: {1}
Unknown macro: {2}
mv_
Unknown macro: {f}
^{2}}
Unknown macro: {Delta t}
= 2.42\times 10^
Unknown macro: {6}
\mbox
Unknown macro: { W}
= \mbox
Unknown macro: {3200 hp}
]\end
We have so far used the time and the velocity information, but we have not yet used the fact that the race is 1/4 mile long. To bring in distance information, we must perform an integral. From the definition of power, we know that we can write:
Unknown macro: {latex}
\begin
Unknown macro: {large}
[ P^
v ]\end
where v is the speed of the dragster. This equation can be integrated using a useful trick.
If we use the fact that the non-conservative force is equal to the net force on the dragster in this case, we can write:
Unknown macro: {latex}
\begin
Unknown macro: {large}
[ P^
Unknown macro: {NC}
= mav = m\frac
Unknown macro: {dv}
Unknown macro: {dt}
v ]\end
we can now use the chain rule to write:
Unknown macro: {latex}
\begin
Unknown macro: {large}
[ \frac
Unknown macro: {dv}
Unknown macro: {dt}
= \frac
Unknown macro: {dx}
\frac
Unknown macro: {dt}
= \frac
Unknown macro: {dv}
Unknown macro: {dx}
v]\end
This gives us the integrable equation:
Unknown macro: {latex}
\begin
Unknown macro: {large}
[ P^
Unknown macro: {NC}
dx = mv^
Unknown macro: {2}
dv ]\end
giving:
Unknown macro: {latex}
\begin
Unknown macro: {large}
[ P^
Unknown macro: {NC}
(x_
Unknown macro: {f}
-x_
Unknown macro: {i}
) = \frac
Unknown macro: {1}
Unknown macro: {3}
m(v_
^
) ]\end
We can now express the power in terms of the distance traveled and the velocity gained:
Unknown macro: {latex}
\begin
Unknown macro: {large}
[ P^
Unknown macro: {NC}
= \frac{mv_
Unknown macro: {f}
{3}}{3x_{f}} = 2.7\times 10
Unknown macro: {6}
\mbox
Unknown macro: { W}
= \mbox
Unknown macro: {3600 hp}
]\end
which is consistent with our previous answer at about the 10% level.