You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 15 Next »

Prototype Photos


v1.0 of user-friendly implementation

The user has drag/dropped two files from the desktop onto the interface and the files have begun uploading to the system.


v1.0 of user-friendly implementation

The user has clicked on one of the uploading albums and sees the detailed album view with cover-art. Each field on this page is editable (the field highlights on a mouse hover and turns into a text-box on click).


v1.0 of high-efficiency implementation

The main screen that shows up on loading. The "+" button at the bottom manually brings up the list of uploading albums and previously uploaded.


v1.0 of high-efficiency implementation

An album (starmarker.zip) has completed uploading and is ready to be approved (and filed) into the playback system.


v1.0 of reporting interface (both aforementioned v1.0 implementations use the same reporting interface)

Currently with no filtering selected, all albums are being shown.


One of the user testing sessions at the WMBR studio.


Some of the interface widgets and task cards used.


v2.0 of our merged implementation

Notice the pause button by each upload progress bar, the clear approve/delete buttons for the album (and the removal of the trash bin icon previously in the top right corner), and the re-wording on the upper left tabs for clarity. Changes not seen include a screen hover on dragging files over the interface (an entire gray-out screen blankets the screen and says "upload"), a highlight on hovering over any editable fields (including the tracks, which then allow editing of artists on individual tracks), and other minor changes. Other forthcoming changes include being able to delete single tracks (also using a hover over track affordance) and a clear visual cue that uploading albums can be clicked on to see specific album information.


A view of the testing session on Monday March 18th.


v2.0 of reporting interface

Notice the Piazza-like tagging for genre filtering (allowing flexible genre additions as well as multi-selection filtering), release date range filter, and additional playback count columns (for easy sorting between commonly used date ranges). Note that there were several transparencies made for both versions of the reporting interface to reflect changes in filtering and when clicking on one of the playback count headers (which sorts by play count in descending order).

Briefing

KaJaMi Participant Briefing

Thank you for taking the time to help us test the prototype of our system.

You will be acting as the “user”, our goal is not to test you, but to test our system and find flaws or inconsistencies that will improve the final implementation.

One person from our group will act as a “computer” who will control the experiment and provide tasks that we would like you to perform using the interface.

The other group members will act as “observers”, and will be taking notes on the experiment.

We will be asking you to perform tasks that relate to your current music director duties, but using our interface instead of what you are normally used to. At a high level these tasks will include importing digital music, previewing music and getting CMJ reporting data. We ask that you do not ask interface related questions during the test itself (as this will better help us find faults in our interface) but we can answer anything after the test is complete.

Thanks and have fun!

Scenario Tasks

Scenario

Task

Imagine you are a music director, Lana, and you wish to upload some albums to the digital library via the KaJaM! interface

Open KaJaM! and log into the system

You have downloaded 2 albums onto your computer: Starmarker.zip and KaJaM.zip and wish to import them to the library

Import Starmarker.zip and KaJaM.zip into the digital library

While KaJaM.zip is importing, you wish to preview one of the tracks

Preview (play) a track in the KaJaM album

The track from the KaJaM album sounds familiar, and you quickly realize you have already imported the album and don't need it again

Delete the currently importing KaJaM album

The Starmarker.zip file finishes importing, and you wish to make sure all the track details are correct

Inspect track details*

You find incorrect and incomplete track details you want to fix

Edit track details to reflect the correct information**

You wish to approve the album to officially file it in the digital library

Approve the album

Before you leave, you wish to complete College Media Journal reporting for the month

Take a look at the reporting data in the digital library

You notice the reporting data is displaying _the Blue Dot _genre, but you want to look at "Electronica/RPM"

Filter the reporting data to show only "Electronica/RPM"

Now all reporting data is on "Electronica/RPM" only, but it is not sorted by play count in the last month

Sort the reporting data by play count in the last month, in descending order

Everything looks good, but you still want to make adjustments to the reports based on physical CD play count before submitting them

Export the reporting data to Excel file format for further editing

Now that you are all done, you wish to go home

Done!

*The album contains tracks with pre-tagged information, but some are incorrect or incomplete:

Track #

Track Name

Artist

Album

Label

Release Date

Genre

1

While I'm Dead

Starmarker

Unknown

Polyvinyl

 

 

2

Sand Beauty

Starmarker

Unknown

Polyvinyl



3

Silvre Lining

Starmarker

Unknown

Polyvinyl 



**The facilitator assumes Lana Googles the album information, so facilitator provides all the correct information to the user on a separate sheet of paper:

Track #

Track Name

Artist

Album

Label

Release Date

Genre

1

While I'm Dead

Starmarker

Killer Kilometer

Polyvinyl

20/02/2013

Electronica/RPM

2

Sand Beauty

Starmarker

Killer Kilometer

Polyvinyl

20/02/2013 

Electronica/RPM

3

Silver Lining

Starmarker

Killer Kilometer

Polyvinyl

20/02/2013 

Electronica/RPM

Observations (Importing Tasks)

Prototype Iteration 1

User

Import Files into the Library

Preview Song Tracks

Delete Importing Album

Inspect and Edit Album/Track Details

Approve Album

Music Director #1

  • User found the drag and drop interface to be intuitive and easily learnable, but isn't familiar with the fact that file start importing as soon as the mouse button is released. Instead, user searched for an "OK" button to start importing officially. This is a tradeoff we made to achieve more efficiency, but sacrifices some safety because the user may inadvertently drop the wrong file on the interface.

Learnability

  • User recognized the play button beside the track right away
    Efficiency
  • User's single click on the play button starts playing the track right away
    Safety
  • If user clicked on play accidentally, a pause button appears in place of the play button to stop track

Learnability

  • On the user-friendly interface, the user had some trouble locating the trash can because it was placed far away from the user's line of vision
  • On the high-efficiency interface, User quickly found the "X" delete button beside the uploading album
    Efficiency:
  • High-efficiency interface requires very little mouse movement to reach the "X" button, whereas the user has to move the cursor all the way across the screen in the user-friendly version of the interface.
    Safety:
  • User prefers that the user-friendly interface gave a confirmation warning before deleting album

Learnability

  • User found the both interfaces to be easy to understand in terms of what information is being displayed
  • Both interfaces lack affordances in terms of what is editable and what isn't, user had to experiment by single clicking on the fields 
    Efficiency
  • User liked how both interfaces showed all the album and track information on one screen
  • User noted the directly editable fields are very convenient
    Safety
  • User noted a mistake in adding the genre can be easily fixed by clicking the "x" beside the genre tag
  • User was confused about how to "approve" the album on both interfaces because he did not associate approval with the "checkmark" button (learnability issue)
  • Again, a tradeoff was made between efficiency and safety: single click on the "checkmark" button will approve the album immediately (efficiency). User prefers a confirmation message (safety).

Music Director #2

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Music Director #3

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

"Elf"

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Prototype Iteration 2

User

Import Files into the Library

Preview Song Tracks

Delete Importing Album

Inspect and Edit Album/Track Details

Approve Album

Student User #1

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Student User #2

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Student User #3

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Observations (Reporting Tasks)

Prototype Iteration 1

User

Switch to Reporting Mode

Filter View by Genre

Sort View by Play Count

Export Reporting Data to Excel File

Music Director #1

  • User found switching modes via the tabbed interface to be easy and intuitive (learnability)
  • Single click on another tab switched the mode immediately (efficiency), and user noted he can easily switch back if he accidentally clicked on another tab (safety)

Learnability

  • User struggled with understanding the "filter" button and what it means - he thought it brings up another "filter" window 
    Efficiency
  • User did not like how selecting a genre from the drop down menu did not filter the genres right away
  • Not efficient to require 2 user clicks every time a genre needs to be filtered
    Safety
  • Requires user to confirm genre choice by explicitly clicking on "Filter", but user did not like this

Learnability

  • User did not know how to sort the rows (no affordances offered to suggest that clicking on the header row sorts it)
  • User noted that having an arrow displayed beside the header would really help to indicate the sort function
    Efficiency:
  • Single click on the head column sorts the table in descending order, second click sorts the table in ascending order. User thought this was convenient
    Safety:
  • User did not know how to "clear" the sort, but eventually just noted that he could just click on another head row to sort by another row instead
  • User found the export button very quickly and no troubles with this task (learnability)
  • User liked that the file started downloading right away without prompting him to confirm (efficiency versus safety)

Music Director #2

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Music Director #3

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

"Elf"

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Prototype Iteration 2

User

Switch to Reporting Mode

Filter View by Genre

Sort View by Play Count

Export Reporting Data to Excel File

Student User #1

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Student User #2

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Student User #3

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Learnability:
Efficiency:
Safety:

Prototype Iterations

Design

First Iteration

Second Iteration

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • No labels