Scenario

Designs

Design 1: Spin the Wheel

This interface models the decision-making process as a gambling game, where players make bets on different criteria (location, price, cuisine) involved in making the final restaurant decision. The gambling metaphor is represented by a spinning wheel, reminiscent of roulette and other games that involve an element of randomness (e.g., Twister). This game can be broken down into 4 distinct steps, each involving a different number of rounds.

Step 1: Selection of Criteria Choices (group)

See Figures 2, 3

The group is required to select choices for location (Figures 2,3) and cuisine (not drawn, but similar to Figures 2,3). Figure 2 displays choices for location as equal sections of the wheel, as opposed to the conventional list. This is used for consistency, as the wheel is the centerpiece of the game. 

Step 2: Bet on Criteria Choices (individual)

See Figures 4, 5, 6 

Each player places bets on each of 3 criteria (location, price, cuisine) by dragging coins from the personal pile on the bottom right-hand corner of the screen to a desired section of the wheel in the center of the screen. Each player is allotted 100 coins for this step, to be distributed (in whatever proportion they choose) amongst the 3 criteria. For example, if a player values location over cuisine type over price, he/she may place 50 coins on location, 30 coins on cuisine, and 20 coins on price.

Step 3: Decide on Criteria Choices (group)

See Figures 7 (shown for location, extrapolate for price and cuisine), 8

The criteria decision is made by spinning the wheel at the center. This is done 3 times, once for each criteria. The final criteria decision is determined based on a weighted probability distribution, which depends on how many coins were placed on each choice. Before the wheel is spun, the sections of the choice wheel are resized to reflect the probability distribution of deciding each criteria. This weighted probability is based on the coin distribution collected from each player in Step 2. For example, in Figure 7, 40% of all coins used (among all players) in Step 2 were placed on Central, whereas only 10% of total coins were placed on Kendall. 

Step 4: Vote on Restaurant Choices  (individual) -> Output Final Decision (group)

See Figure 9, 10

Each player votes (as opposed to bet in previous rounds) on their favorite restaurant (Figure 9), and the wheel will decide the final restaurant choice (Figure 10), based on weighted probability like in Step 3. 

Design 2: Auction Sale

This interface models the decision-making process as an auction sale, where participants bid for the opportunity to choose one criteria of the decision-making process (location, cuisine, price, restaurant). Participants are given an allocation of credits to spend during four rounds of bidding. This game can be broken down into 2 distinct steps, with step 2 involving multiple rounds for bidding on each criteria.

Step 1: Login (individual)

See Figures 1 - 5

Each user signs in (Figure 1), and one participant creates a new event and invites the others (Figures 2-5).

Step 2: Bidding on Criteria (individual)

See Figures 6 - 11

(Before bidding begins, choices for each criteria (location, price, cuisine) are automatically generated by the application. Location will be generated based on a sampling of places that are near to the group's geographic position. Prices ($, $$, $$$, $$$$) are default choices, and cuisine types will be randomly generated.)

The decision-making process involves 4 rounds of bidding that work like a normal auction sale (Figures 7-11). Each participant is presented with the highest bid, and his/her own highest bid so far (Figures 8-9). If a participant is not in the lead, he/she may increase his/her bid to one more than the previous highest bid. After a bid has not been made for a certain length of time (~10 seconds), the auction ends, and the winner of that round may choose one aspect of the decision (Figure 10). Others are then informed of the choice (Figure 11). The auction process happens four times. The first 3 rounds determine the location, cuisine, and price range of the final choice. Based on those results, the interface presents the participants with several restaurant choices, and a fourth round of bidding determines the final result.

Design 3: Slot Machine

This interface models the decision-making process as a slot machine game. Like in Spin the Wheel, each player makes bets on different criteria (location, price, cuisine) involved in making the final restaurant decision. The gambling metaphor is represented by a slot machine instead of a spinning wheel. While not so conceptually different from Spin the Wheel, Slot Machine is significantly different in terms of user experience. Most notably, less user interaction is required. Users can bet on the 3 criteria (location, price, cuisine) all in one screen, reducing the amount of time to complete the decision task. 

Step 1: Selection of Criteria Choices (group)

See Figures 2, 3

The group is required to select choices for location, price, and cuisine. Each criteria is editable. Clicking on "EDIT" will take the user to a screen that presents a variety of ways to populate the chosen criteria category. For example, choosing "Nearby" will display a list of nearby locations that the user can check from. The user can also search for locations using zipcode and keywords (e.g. Central, MIT, etc). This will also take the user to a list of corresponding locations that look like Figure . A similar process is carried out for price (although this category has less choices - $, $$, $$$, $$$$) and cuisine.  "Done" is pressed when the group is finished selecting all criteria choices.

Step 2: Assigning Points to Criteria Choices (individual)

See Figures 4, 5, 6 

This is where the metaphor departs. In this step, we use a slot machine interface for betting on different choices. Like in Spin the Wheel, users assign points to their desired criteria choice. When this is done, the "Decide" button is pressed. The point assignments are saved, and the phone is passed to the next individual in the group. 

Step 3: Decide on Criteria Choices (group)

See Figures 7 (shown for location, extrapolate for price and cuisine), 8

The criteria decision is made by pressing the "Decide It!" button in Figure .., which will run the slot machine. The slot machine decided on the final combination of location, price, and cuisine based on a weighted probability of individual choices (just as described in Spin the Wheel). Though randomness is evident, the weighted probability scheme is more hidden to the end user (whereas in "Spin the Wheel"), sections of the choice wheel morphed to represented their probability weighting. 

Step 4: Vote on Restaurant Choices  (individual) -> Output Final Decision (group)

The app generates 3 choices for the group to vote on based on the final criteria decisions made in step 3. Figure ... allows users to find out more details on each selection. The "Round 2" button takes game into the final round, where individuals must vote on their desired restaurant choice. The final restaurant choice is determined by the slot machine based on the weighted probability scheme mentioned in Step 3 and in Spin the Wheel.