Last year's winning poster

WHAT WE LIKE

Sub group oriented

Obvious flow

Emphasis on something

Good title (Brief, Understandable)

Good section titles

Brief, digestable context

Eye catching

Size proportional to importance

Conclusion / future impact

 

WHAT WE DON'T LIKE

Too much structure

Too much text

Too little text

Irrelevant figures

Bad/Wrong plots

Missing captions

Verbose captions

WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE AS OF NOW (9.21.14)

 

 

Another poster version: poster.svg

Some drawings of receptors: Receptor.svg

WHAT ELSE SHOULD GO ON IT?

Subgroups sent me project descriptions today and pictures too (which i have yet to find space for). Thoughts on Layout? Post them here so the poster can keep changing

UPDATE:  There's an attachment called Receptor.svg that contains some preliminary drawings of receptors for use on the poster - feel free to edit this in Inkscape!

  • No labels