Note: The original scope of this theme was Infrastructure and Tools. Sustainability was a separate theme, but the recommendation of the Sustainability and Incentives team was to integrate it with Infrastructure and Tools, 

Meeting #1: Define key questions/considerations on this theme which the Open 2020 Working Group should address.

Team: Nicole Allen, Nichole Saad, Peter Suber, Ross Mounce, Amy Brand, Mark McBride, Sharon Leu, Brianna Schofield

Who else should be part of the infrastructure conversation?

  • Voices from the global south
  • Funders, especially if they understand interoperability
  • Coders, such as CoKo (Kristen Ratan), and someone with history in major open ed tech developments (e.g., Kim Thanos)
  • Students/users
  • People who specialize in robust preservation

What are the work products?

  • We need an inventory of existing OER tools and platforms, including licensing. This could be included as part of the IOI census.
  • Best practices in contracting with proprietary platforms
  • Value proposition for why you should use open infrastructure
  • Outline of consortial ownership model for relevant infrastructure
  • Openness metric/index
  • "Almetric" styles indicators of OER usage/uptake
  • Standard format for syllabi (e.g., to support Open Syllabus Project and interoperability)

What are the core questions?

  • Sustainability: what is the role of the academy? How to move beyond well-meaning volunteerism? How to weigh and the pros and cons of proprietary alternatives, and service providers for open source solutions?
  • How do we learn from the failures of the past in open infrastructure? When should we be willing to compromise?

Definitions

  • What do we mean by infrastructure, which is a layered stack? Platforms, software, tools. standards, metadata. What about pure content – is it infrastructure too? Not clear, need to distinguish "particle" and "wave" forms of content. Perhaps we're really talking about digital infrastructure here.

 

Examples of OER Sustainability:

SUNY OER Services campus sustainability project

5 Comments

  1. Anonymous

    Who else should be part of the infrastructure conversation?

    • Voices from the global south
    • Funders, especially if they understand interoperability
    • Coders, such as CoKo (Kristen Ratan), and someone with history in major open ed tech developments (e.g., Kim Thanos)
    • Students/users
    • People who specialize in robust preservation

     

    What are the work products?

    • We need an inventory of existing OER tools and platforms. This could be included as part of the IOI census.
    • Best practices in contracting with proprietary platforms
    • Value proposition for why you should use open infrastructure
    • Outline of consortial ownership model for relevant infrastructure
    • Openness metric/index
    • "Almetric" styles indicators of OER usage/uptake
    • Standard format for syllabi (e.g., to support OSP and interoperability)

     

    What are the core questions?

    • Sustainability: what is the role of the academy? How to move beyond well-meaning volunteerism? How to weigh and the pros and cons of proprietary alternatives, and service providers for open source solutions?
    • How do we learn from the failures of the past in open infrastructure? When should we be willing to compromise?

    Definitions

    • What do we mean by infrastructure, which is a layered stack? Platforms, software, tools. standards, metadata. What about pure content – is it infrastructure too? Not clear, need to distinguish "particle" and "wave" forms of content. Perhaps we're really talking about digital infrastructure here.

     

     

  2. Anonymous

    Infrastructure also includes licenses.

  3. We should make sure to talk about multiple diverse sources of support, re sustainability...

Write a comment…