Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...


2005 Advisory Board initial responses:
– Enterprise-Level Tools for Learning
– Ubiquitous Wireless
– Hybrid Learning (Blended Learning)
– Students' Communication Tools
2006 Advisory Board initial responses:
Ubiquitous networks – not just wireless, but also high-speed networking, and especially highspeed networking to rurual areas, via powerlines (Diana Oblinger) Might push this further ahead in time. New Pew study finds broadband adoption nearing a plateau, after barely 1/2 of Americans signed on (Bryan Alexander)
Community Networks – is the Internet a utility? (Diana Oblinger)
Grid computing and e-Science – the ability to easily move and share large data sets, and to put authentic data int hehands of students could be transformational (Diana Oblinger)
RSS – Has done much to foster individual expression – but we are only beginning to tap it for learning (Diana Oblinger)
— Also, syndication of more then text content (images, audio, video) and tech to mix feeds from multiple sources into something new (Alan Levine)
--video production and sharing - this has become much easier, and is already exfoliating into numerous delivery mechanisms (DVD, vlogging, OurMedia) (Bryan Alexander)
— putting Torrent technology to educational use? (Alan Levine) See also IP issues, below (Bryan Alexander)
--audio production and sharing - see video preceding. Think of connections with other technologies, such as syndication (podcasting) and mobile devices (Bryan Alexander)
net documents shared writing environments, documents that live on the network, not the desktop, wikis come to prime time (Alan Levine)
web standard content creation tools It's time to stop making content not up to modern web standards that can be used on multiple devices, address accessibility (Alan Levine) Does this include microcontent? (Bryan Alexander)
screen casting audior ecording captured over screen action; to do more than just explain how to use software, but to deliver advanced concepts (Alan Levine)

...


2006 Advisory Board initial responses:
Information Literacy – in the way librarians use the term. Do students have the cognitive basis to know good information when they find it? Info Literacy has three components: technical, cognitive, and ethical – the last one, ethical, is especially challenging in a remix culture where attribution is less valued than in the past (Diana Oblinger) How will librarians practically keep up with the digital? (Bryan Alexander)
Digital Divide – while not a new trend, still very importabt socially (Diana Oblinger)
Support – All of us are becoming less expert. Are we growing that cadre of people that ww will need to support the great ideas coming our way? (Diana Oblinger)
Science and Technology Leadership – we are not graduating or attracting the numbers of people we need in the sciences, and are falling further behind all the time. We need a "Sputnik" episode to wake us up. (Diana Oblinger)
--IP issues - we're returning to the medieval theme of cloisters, by walling off campus digital environments. At the same time, global projects and functions increase in ease of use, scope, and importance (Web 2.0, GoogleEarth, etc. etc.) How to respond to this enormous division? (Bryan Alexander)
Student/Teacher Gaps In Tech Use it may grow wider and create more discomfort and dis-satisfaction (Alan Levine)
Technology Churn Can we live with technologies that recycle, grow, change on a monthly, daily basis, rather than yearly basis? Can we accept not being masters of technology? (Alan Levine)

add your thoughts here ... click the 'edit page' link ...

...


2006 Advisory Board initial responses:
Timeshifting – technology is allowing us more and more freedom to choose when and where we want to have an experience (Diana Oblinger)
Distributed Cognition/Social Networking (Diana Oblinger)
Visualization – 3-D can hold more info than 2-D (Diana Oblinger)
Increasing Individualization the explosive growth of self-publishing is just one example; Flickr and other online communities also encurage individualization of the experience; peer-to-peer has some interesting social dimensions that faciliate this as well (Diana Oblinger)
Mobility – People increasingly want their technology to go (Diana Oblinger)
IP again - see previous notes about walled gardens versus open content (Bryan Alexander)



add your thoughts here ... click the 'edit page' link ...