...
Revisit Ref Vision:
We discussed our progress on Service Levels #1-4 (pp. 3-6) or the Reference Vision, as well as the text of the vision as stated. Lisa H. also reported that the Libraries is considering changing the Ref Vision to a single Public Services Vision.
Service lv 1.
- Where we fall short: We agreed that more work was need on mobile web presence, but that we should follow IS&T's lead. Also that we need to highlight E-Reference from multiple angles, and across groups, as the shift away from print resources effects all libraries.
Service lv 2.
- Where we fall short: We discussed phone reference, but did not agree that we had fallen short in this category. We decided to keep the text as written.
We discussed a need for an instructional vision, or plan. We also discussed problems with "First Year Orientation". In particular that there is not enough, and what we have is not well coordinated; specifically for new faculty and researchers.
...