...
Additional input for SAIS team members
Wins
- Including more detail on the Action Log and implementation plan than in the past
- Everyone stepped up to meet the shortened deadlines by working extra hours but this shouldn't become a habit
- Second year of SIT execution
- Now have two years of SIT scripts
- Some business owners / users updated scripts on their own
- Aliases worked well again this year
...
Challenges
- Implement the support packs and enhancements in a sandbox/prototype environment first to get a better idea of the impact and time needed
- Start review/analysis of the support packs already received earlier - don't perform testing until all are received
- A A spreadsheet is not the best tool for keeping the information needed for testing; a DB or other tool would be helpful
- Have an environment with the changes applied available so development can continue
- During During the implementation, please don't move status calls earlier without at least an hour's notice
- Extended team meetings were not conducted frequently enough
- Information dissemination was pushed down to the individual functional teams, didn't come from one place
- Many individual test scripts still not updated
- I had responsibility for approving UAT for some business areas due to staff turnover
- Confusion about when UAT ended
- Confusion about what could be tested during period end closing
- Confusion about the intention of SIT / UAT
- Business owners were told they did not have to test during UAT; they could accept the results of SIT as UAT; created a mess that had to be re-communicated at length
- Not enough communication
- Scheduling of users during UAT wasn't done consistently; given a time period and a deadline and told to meet it; created lots of uncertainty around the deadline
{"serverDuration": 112, "requestCorrelationId": "15cb4a91438c9341"}