Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Additional input for SAIS team members

Wins

  • Including more detail on the Action Log and implementation plan than in the past
  • Everyone stepped up to meet the shortened deadlines by working extra hours but this shouldn't become a habit
  • Second year of SIT execution
  • Now have two years of SIT scripts
  • Some business owners / users updated scripts on their own
  • Aliases worked well again this year

...

Challenges

  • Implement the support packs and enhancements in a sandbox/prototype environment first to get a better idea of the impact and time needed
  • Start review/analysis of the support packs already received earlier - don't perform testing until all are received
  •  A A spreadsheet is not the best tool for keeping the information needed for testing; a DB or other tool would be helpful
  • Have an environment with the changes applied available so development can continue
  •  During During the implementation, please don't move status calls earlier without at least an hour's notice
  • Extended team meetings were not conducted frequently enough
  • Information dissemination was pushed down to the individual functional teams, didn't come from one place
  • Many individual test scripts still not updated
  • I had responsibility for approving UAT for some business areas due to staff turnover
  • Confusion about when UAT ended
  • Confusion about what could be tested during period end closing
  • Confusion about the intention of SIT / UAT
  • Business owners were told they did not have to test during UAT; they could accept the results of SIT as UAT; created a mess that had to be re-communicated at length
  • Not enough communication
  • Scheduling of users during UAT wasn't done consistently; given a time period and a deadline and told to meet it; created lots of uncertainty around the deadline