- Overall Timing Reminder (should be done by now, Jan 25 drop dead)
-
- Karen to discuss with Jaime encouraging more faculty to be present at the open house.
- Beth, Nick, Karen to discuss modifying the acceptance letter to clarify how appointments with the faculty are set up.
- Beth to send numbers regarding travel reimbursements for all students to Karen, Karen to discuss to Jaime.
- Nick to send mail to faculty telling them to start reading. (Will do this Monday)
- Nick to ask Sophia to start scheduling sector admissions meetings.
- Karen to follow up on the USAF Academy data.
- Karen to send email to faculty requesting yield data early next week.
- Review status
- Kerri Cahoy Rookie of the Year Award (Jackie Robinson award in MLB)
- 523 Complete Folders out of 545 started. 523 compares to 466 last year.
- x Probably Reject
- y Admissible and sent to Sectors
- z need GAC to finish reviews (zz Folders GAC needs to read, concentrated in yy, BLW to twist arms)
- We are a little behind and should just finish
- Review rejected minority/female candidates
- BLW to project list of URM and Female and discuss real time
-
- Open house: Open house is March 15th
- Improved format from last year (thanks Beth!) to be continued
- Faculty participation Ask to ask
- /Jaime to encourage this, other ideas?
- Set expectations in acceptance letter (was this done last year as planned?) - make appointments with individual faculty
- Beth to tell us how travel reimbursement works for students based on last year. Modify acceptance letter?
- Sector meetings being scheduled (any update?)
- Actions?
- USAF academy rankings should be here (BLW requested)
-
- Need to start collecting yield data. Action: Karen to send out email to faculty requesting yield data early next week.Yield data (survey to faculty) went out from Karen. Jan. 21 due date, suggest Karen followup Jan. 18 (Fri)
- Any comments on the process, suggested changes for the future?
- Open discussion
- BLW observation. Our increased volume of applicants, but non-volume-based criteria for sending to Sectors, may be sending too many low-quality applicants to the faculty.
- Our cutoff for sending to Sector might be adjusted upward or redefined given applicant volume vs. Admission Need.
- Last year 104 were Admitted, yet 271 were sent to Faculty to read
- As of 1/13/13, we have 202 Folders done by GAC with 3+ average score, and 142 between 2 and 3. Numbers not final but one might think that all our Admits (assuming similar to last year) could come from 3+ bucket
- This would essentially pull Needed student volume (from faculty survey) forward in the Admissions process
- Discuss?
{"serverDuration": 141, "requestCorrelationId": "4d5112e1f5cad074"}