Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Section
Column
width300px
Page Tree
root15DOTs60ia13:Tutorial
Column
Wiki Markup
 

h1. Valid inequalities

Valid inequalities are additional constraints that can be added to a correct integer program that potentially strengthen the formulation, i.e. reduce the size of the feasible region for the linear programming relaxation.
For example, in the 0-1 knapsack problem,
{mathdisplay}
\begin{aligned}
&\max&\sum_{i=1}^n v_i x_i\\
&\text{subject to}& \sum_{i=1}^n w_i x_i &\leq b\\
&&x_i & \in \{0,1\}&i&=1,\ldots,n,
\end{aligned}
{mathdisplay}
for any set {mathinline}C \subset \{1,\ldots,n\}{mathinline} such that
{mathdisplay}
\sum_{i \in C} w_i > b
{mathdisplay}
we can add the _cover inequalities_
{mathdisplay}
\sum_{i \in C} x_i \leq |C|-1
{mathdisplay}
To be completely concrete, suppose that {mathinline}n=2{mathinline}, and our instance was
{mathdisplay}
\begin{aligned}
&\max& x_1 + 2x_2\\
&\text{subject to}& 3x_1 + 4 x_2 &\leq 5\\
&&x_1,\, x_2 & \in \{0,1\}.
\end{aligned}
{mathdisplay}
The feasible region of this LP and the feasible region of the integer hull are shown below.
{chart:type=xyarea|legend=true|xLabel=x\_1}
|| ||0||1||1.6667||
|LP|1.25|.5| 0|
|IP hull|1|0|0|
{chart}
Observing that {mathinline}3+5 > 5{mathinline}, we can apply a cover inequality with the set {mathinline}\{1,2\}{mathinline} to obtain the inequality
{mathdisplay}
x_1 + x_2 \leq 1.
{mathdisplay}
Observe that adding this inequality to the knapsack formulation makes the LP relaxation integral, thus it is a stronger formulation.

h1. User Cuts in CPLEX

User cuts are, at a high level, valid inequalities for an integer program that strengthen the formulation, but are not required for correctness ofCPLEX will optionally add while searching for an integer solution.  Like lazy cuts, user cuts can be added either before the optimization begins (with {{addUserCut()}} from {{IloCplex}}) or by using a {{UserCutCallback}} (documentation [here|http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/cosinfoc/v12r5/index.jsp?topic=%2Filog.odms.cplex.help%2Frefjavacplex%2Fhtml%2Filog%2Fcplex%2FIloCplex.UserCutCallback.html]) to detect violated constraints on the fly and add them to the formulation.  


CPLEX checks for violated user cuts at the highlighted stage in the diagram below.
{gliffy:name=userCutCplex|align=left|size=L|version=1}
As you can see, there is no guarantee that a feasible solution will satisfy all of the user cuts, as LP solutions which are integral are sent through the lazy constraints to the incumbent.  Thus if a constraint is necessary for the formulation to be correct, but you want to check for it as a user cut, you must also check for it as a lazy cut.  Additionally, we have the benefit that our method for identifying user cuts doesn't need to work 100\% of the time, as if it fails we always have the lazy cuts for insurance.  This is how we will be using user cuts for our TSP solver.