...
- Update on Video project and feedback
- Budget for FY 2010
- Calendar confirmation for upcoming year
- Value system for core services criteria
Wiki Markup
- Update on Video project and feedback
- Budget for FY 2010
- Calendar confirmation for upcoming year
- Value system for core services criteria
...
- Update on Video project and feedback
- Planning for Sept. 30 Accordiac Meeting
- Next Steps re core services criteria
Sept. 14, 2009
Wiki Markup - feedback from new faculty orientation \ [10 minutes\]unmigrated-wiki-markup
- Institute Wide TF \ [10 minutes\]unmigrated-wiki-markup
- Accordiac meeting agenda \ [20 minutes\]unmigrated-wiki-markup
- Core Service metrics: next steps \ [20 minutes\]
Wiki Markup
Sept. 28, 2009
- debrief from presentation of video recommendations to CET and determine next steps
- core service metrics: next steps
...
Present: Babi, Cec, Steve, and Vijay
...
- ACCORD composition \ --\- guiding principles, process for deciding, who will decide, roles and responsibilities \ [15 minutes\]
Discussion focused on ACCORD relationship to MITCET strategy and goals, the process for joining and leaving ACCORD, and how to insure good customer engagement. One suggestion is to add a "customer" representative from one of the DLC's to ACCORD. It was decided that we should defer any action on that suggestion until we developed better clarity about our own roles and responsibilities and that of the Accordiacs.
...
- Inputs on key services from the March 18th Accordiacs meeting \ --\- next steps: Identify trends, categorize \ [30 minutes\]
Working from the notes of the March 18 meeting, we focused on agreeing on the criteria that would define "core" services. The initial list was cross-organizationall, breadth, depth, one time v. long term, impact, cost, benefit, prestige/leadership. Steve agreed to draft definitions for each of these criteria for review at the next meeting. Once there's agreement on the criteria, we will then create a matrix using the services identified from the March 18 meeting to test the criteria.
Wiki Markup
Babi provided an update from the recent meeting of the Image Tools Group. The group decided it would focus on two areas over the next few months: 1. improving the availability of image copyright information and help within the images section of the Teaching w/Technology website, and 2. developing a short questionnaire that can be used when meeting with faculty regarding their image needs and that also might be posted as a short survey at point of use on the TwT website.
Wiki Markup
This topic was deferred to a future meeting.
...
- Communication to Accordiacs re ACCORD membership/role changes
- We agreed to provide an update to the Accordiacs on the sponsors meeting, the rotating convening role, ACCORD membership, and recent activities. Steve will draft message.
- Criteria for identifying core servicesDiscussion and updating of draft document continued.
- We agreed that we need to develop a "grading" system, and that we should take the list of services generated from Accordiac meeting in March, consolidate it, and then apply criteria to it. Oliver will create spreadsheet, Babi will draft "grades", and then each of us will apply values to the spreadsheet.
- Accordiac roles/responsibilitiesBrainstormed list of possible roles and responsibilities:
- communicate - 3 way, with each other, to ACCORD, back to their DLC
Wiki Markup - contributing to cross-organizational projects, development of new services
- contribute to building Accordiac community
- provide early user feedback on new service initiatives
- We need to get Accordiacs input on their ideas for roles/responsibilities.
...
- Video
- Agreed on draft and membership for implementation team
- Accordiac agenda
- OTP project – Babi & Greg provide update
- Video update
- Roundtable
- Future items:
- Thematic services idea
- Sloan talk about Sharepoint experience
- ACCORD priorities
- LMS process
- Facilitating engagement
- See what comes out of next LMS meeting
- Follow-up on service metrics as they inform our discussion for determining impact; Steve will draft a template for data gathering \ [input/output/outcome\]
- Other items
- Think about Accord role in developing thematic service configurations, e.g. energy initiative, global education, maybe like library research guides idea.
- Responsibility for TWT website – think about Ranjani & Molly playing a more active role
- LMS process
...
- Brainstorm on how to move forward with video capture for GIR's
- Vision – for some set of courses and/or classrooms we have infrastructure and process in place to allow faculty to specify prior to the course that they want their course captured and made available to their students at a very low barrier; available to students would be audio, video, presentations, blackboard capture soon after the class; needs to be at a low cost and simple for faculty to do; reusable; processes for archiving
- Lot’s of policy workflow issues to work through
- Turn key options
- Deploy in more classrooms than fewer to avoid scheduling issues
- Focus on 5 largest rooms where GIRS are currently taught for phase 1 – 26-100, 54-100, 32-123, 10-250, 34-101
- What is the minimal “feature” set required for capture?
- read the blackboard
- Good audio
Wiki Markup - Talking head
- High definition
Wiki Markup
- Transcription as part of post processing \ [important to itemize as cost factor\]
- Develop cost estimates
- What are backend infrastructure costs?unmigrated-wiki-markup
- Opencast -- – contact Mara \ [steve will do\]
Wiki Markup Wiki Markup