Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Please

...

place

...

any

...

data

...

analysis

...

products

...

related

...

to

...

fitting

...

N132D

...

here,

...

under

...

the

...

appropriate

...

section

...

for

...

each

...

instrument.

...

Please

...

date

...

each

...

entry

...

so

...

we

...

have

...

a

...

log

...

of

...

submissions.

...

JPEG

...

and

...

GIF

...

images

...

can

...

be

...

displayed

...

inline,

...

which

...

other

...

files

...

(PDF,

...

PS,

...

PHA

...

files,

...

event

...

lists)

...

should

...

be

...

included

...

as

...

attachments

...

with

...

a

...

link

...

to

...

the

...

file.

...

...

...

Anchor
Chandra ACIS
Chandra ACIS

Chandra ACIS

 0.35-8.0

...

keV

...

image

...

from

...

an

...

89

...

ks

...

ACIS-S3

...

observation

...

with

...

the

...

proposed

...

extraction

...

region

...

overlaid.

...

 There are about 2.5

...

million

...

total

...

counts

...

from

...

the

...

SNR

...

in

...

this

...

data

...

set.

Image Added

 Chandra image from a larger region that has been smoothed and contrast enhanced with the XIS extraction region overlaid to determine if there are any bright sources in the XIS extraction region: Image Added
Fit to the ACIS spectrum with the ESAC version 1.0 model for the 2.0-10.0

...

keV

...

range.

Image Added

Fit with the ESAC version v1.0 model in the 2.0-4.0

...

kV

...

range

...

looking

...

for

...

any

...

missing

...

lines,

...

there

...

do

...

not

...

appear

...

to

...

be

...

any

...

line

...

features

...

that

...

the

...

ACIS

...

spectrum

...

would

...

require: Image Added

...

Anchor
Chandra HETG
Chandra HETG

Chandra HETG


...

Anchor
Suzaku XIS
Suzaku XIS

Suzaku XIS

Suzaku/XIS1 full-band image with extraction region in magenta (left) compared to ACIS image and extraction region in green (right).
Image Added

Suzaku/XIS spectra (black=XIS1, red=XIS0, green=XIS3) from 2010-07-27,

...

with

...

E212_v1.0_20110439.xcm

...

model

...

folded

...

through.

...

A

...

constant

...

normalization

...

factor

...

was

...

allowed

...

to

...

vary

...

for

...

each

...

XIS,

...

but

...

everything

...

else

...

was

...

fixed.

...

Norms

...

are

...

1.27,

...

1.31,

...

1.28

...

(so

...

~30%

...

larger

...

than

...

XMM

...

model).

...


Image Added

Spectra of Suzaku/XIS

...

N132D

...

obs,

...

with

...

old

...

XMM

...

model

...

folded

...

through
Image Added

Update 2020-12-01

Eric's work simultaneously fitting the NXB+CXB background to Suzaku XIS (FI CCD) observations of N132D.

Presentation to IACHEC 2020 Symposium:  PDF  Video

Tarball of data and XSPEC command files showing example fit procedure: suzaku_background_fit_example.tar.gz

Update 2021-05-12

Comparison of v2.13 empirical model and 'n132d_afoster_suzuki_vrnei_20210420' physical model: miller_n132d_suzaku_20210512.pdf


...

Anchor
Swift XRT
Swift XRT

Swift XRT


...

Anchor
XMM MOS
XMM MOS

XMM MOS 

Coadded MOS spectra at high energies from 10 observations (processed as of 11-may-2011).

...

Total

...

Exposure

...

~

...

257

...

ksec.

...

In

...

total

...

there

...

more

...

than

...

40

...

observations

...

in

...

the

...

XMM

...

archive.
Image Added

Image Added

...

Anchor
XMM pn
XMM pn

XMM pn


...

Anchor
XMM RGS
XMM RGS

XMM RGS


...

NICER XTI

NICER has ~21 ksec good data, taken between 2018-01-29 and 2018-02-23.  All 52 operating detectors were enabled.

Data were screened for undershoots in 0-40 ct/s/FPM range and overshoots in the 0-2 ct/s/FPM range, plus an additional cut on high energy X-ray counts (>2 keV, 0-4.5 ct/s/FPM cut).

This is a fit using the v2.11 model, only allowing the overall norm and NICER SCORPEON background terms to vary.

Image Added

The NICER norm is 0.993.  The backgrounds are pretty reasonable, although the "LEEL" background component would indicate a slightly rare condition.  Without "LEEL", the fit demands an additional high energy background component in the 2-10 keV range.

Using the v2.14 model, the NICER situation is considerable worse.

Image Added

NICER is not particularly sensitive to emission in the Fe K region.




...

Attachments:

Attachments