You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 8 Next »

Responsible Engineers: Justin, Aimee, Tamara, Alex

 

Week 1 Assignments:

 

Medusa Characterization Motor Design

  • New characterization motor design
    • propellant casting tube & liner
    • case can be reused
      • maybe make 2 in case one breaks
    • very thick case to accommodate a range of pressures
      • 300 psi to 2000/2500 psi
      • case should be rated for 3000 psi
    • need to test at pressures expected during flight
    • drill hole in liner to read pressure transducer
    • make forward closure part of the case
      • disassembly is harder
      • saves on O-rings
      • test with blue thunder ring 
    • adding o-ring on nozzle side
    • glue disk to bottom
    • Put steel ring on top w/small hole and clock accordingly
  • Pour propellant in layers into liner
  • Propose changing nozzle size to change pressure
  • Smaller setup (less propellant) than large motors tested for Phoenix
    • Scaling issues?
    • No mandril
    • Could 3d print casting hardware
    • Plug and Play 
    • Easier to do in blast chamber
      • Cheaper
      • Less travel
    • Data collection is easier (each fire is one data point w/one burn rate)
    • Need to keep length of motor constant (affects burn rate)
    • Pressure transducer on bottom
  • RTV use
    • very time consuming waiting to dry
    • need to use RTV on nozzles
    • to minimize time make nozzle integration faster
    • all phenalic and graphite must be replaced
  • Clocking
    • also time consuming
    • less of an issue if tolerancing is better
  • Nozzles
    • on the order of 2 inches
    • will be machining lots of nozzles
    • need to figure out nozzle range to get desired pressure values

Segmented Motors

  • Done on Hermes
  • Scale back on erosive burning
    • Have a less complex grain geometry
  • Separate layers using RTV

Phoenix Issues

  • Experienced leakage
    • No seal (tolerancing issues with O-rings)
  • Data analysis was done badly

 

  • No labels