Responsible Engineers: Ellie, Abraheim, Trevor, Jorian, Tamara, Berkin, Elizabeth

3/4 Assignments

Trevor - stealing ellie's stuff

Ellie - plasticizer and bonding agents and other liquids (how to get more burn out of it), look into GAP

Abraheim - nail down breakdown of solids packing ratio for aluminum and AP, find suppliers for all types of AP, do solids packing calcs

Tamara - look into combustion simulation (Rpa emailing for full license, contact burnsim) , email GTL regarding thermal camera. 

Jorian - nail down percentages of aluminum boride, find suppliers

Berkin - look into ADN and GAP, look into burn rate suppressants 

Lee - magnesium boride



Simulation update: 

  • Jorian requested NASA RoCETS software.
  • Emailed Zolti for suggestions, thermal camera in GTL, burnsim recommended.
  • Flow 3D could be viable, has free academic license but needs to be installed department wide- possibly negotiable over email though. 
  • Propep (used before) 
  • There are combustion temperature equations that we could theoretically code but that's a lot of work.


Improvements We Want from Angry Goat

  • higher isp (Angry goat had 200-210 isp)
  • increased efficiency
  • burn closer to surface of propellant


Erosive burning

  • higher throat entrance to throat area ratio 


Solids packing

  • 4-6-1 
    • 400, 90 micron AP, 3 micron Al
  • Most use aggregate of aluminum sizes ranging between 3 micron and 40 micron


Things to look into:

 

Notes on fuel and additives to fix slag issues

  • Lithium (hella toxic and expensive) and boron have the best combustion temperatures (gravimetrically)
    • Boron has high efficiency but it requires high heat of combustion and it is easily oxidized so a boron oxide film forms around the boron atoms and prevents diffusion of oxygen during combustion. (would probably need more oxidizer and decrease the amount of aluminum and boron/magnesium)
    • Instead use metal borides
      • Aluminum Diborate (around 1-6 microns)
        • 121.5 J/cc (volumetric)
        • 37.5 kJ/g
        • Decreases ignition delay by a factor of 1.5-2
        • Described on page 8 ENERGETICMATERIALSANDMETALBORIDESFORSOLIDPROPELLANTROCKETENGINES819441-1374197.pdf
        • longer burn time than aluminum-boron mixture (what we are looking for), longer ignition delay (need stronger hei) (source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1270963818322673)
        • limits on boron aluminum combustion can be controlled by changing the combustion temp (https://collections.lib.utah.edu/details?id=195697). we can change combustion temperature to have a more complete reaction. 
        • utah paper purchased: H.C. Starck Grade A AlB2. they found the commerical powder had 82.4%, with the remaining percent being mainly free aluminum, and then ~2% oxygen (it appears boron is the limiting reactant which is good because it suppresses the burn which we don't want but the extra aluminum will contribute to the burn). found that the surface area was 2.09 m^2/g for commercial
      • Magnesium diborate
      • https://collections.lib.utah.edu/details?id=195697 - thermodynamic comparisons of a number of metal borides including magnesium and aluminum diboride
    • Large boron particles increase linear burn rate (makes the combustion occur closer to the surface of the propellant) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0010508222050136(make someone read this because it has a lot of formulas about sims so maybe make someone make a sim)
      • Also increases temperature
  • Magnesium
    • Increases heat of combustion but is much more toxic
    • And much more reactive (apparently can react just with water and explode. Not good)
  • in general notes
    • pressing the propellant in the utah link increased reaction - ig this says what we already knew about vacuuming to decrease voids

Need to find a way to test propellant burning in vacuum. try to find professional solid prop person to ask about how to simulate this/do appropriate testing

 

Notes on plasticizers:

Looked into an alternative to HTPB: PBAN (used on NASA boosters). But PBAN is more difficult to mix, and has similar performance. (https://www.nasa.gov/returntoflight/system/system_SRB.html) (http://www.braeunig.us/space/propel.htm#:~:text=PBAN%20formulations%20give%20a%20slightly,more%20flexible%20than%20PBAN%20binder)

We can decrease burn rate by including a suppressant, such as oxamide (which should not impact performance). (https://www.nakka-rocketry.net/burnrate.html)

 



  • No labels