Victoria Pham 11/2/2024
- Fin Can Assembly
- Material composition
- fins
- G-10 Fiberglass Core; 5 carbon fiber layups alternating grain direction; clipped delta shape
- Max Flutter Velocity was not within our margins of safety, so the fin dimensions will change accordingly
- G-10 Fiberglass Core; 5 carbon fiber layups alternating grain direction; clipped delta shape
- Fin can (4 fins)
- epoxy filets (.75" - 1") for each side of conjoining fin
- tip to tip fiberglass (better than carbon fiber for thermal protection at higher speeds)
- fins
- Material composition
- Stability (RASAero Simulations)
- With a max altitude of 33,829 ft, stability ranges from 2-4.5 with and without wind. After burnout, exceeds 4 → very stable
- Preliminary Calculations
- Lift Force
- account for if the rocket deviates from expected path.
- Subsonic flight: 200lbf
- Supersonic: 226lbf
- Bending Moment
- Idealized calculation: assuming uniformly distributed pressure, and isotropic material behavior
- 564 lbf*in
- Because we are using composite materials, we want to conduct real testing than rely on theoretical upper bounds for loads.
- Idealized calculation: assuming uniformly distributed pressure, and isotropic material behavior
- Sheer Force
- Drag and Inertia ||: 18lbf//8.6lbf
- Lift Perpendicular: 226lbf
- Lift Force
- Fin Load Tests
- Max F applied: 375lbf (1.5x expected lift shear force)
- Moment 4" from joint (2.5x expected bending moment)
- Difference from .75" fillet and 1" fillet is marginal
- Jig bent from load (we assume this is why the graph doesn't match the elastic deformation curve) and couldn't test until failure.
- Idea for Better Test
- 2 fins instead of one for a more accurate representation of force
- symmetric force, testing 10% load increments
- 2 fins instead of one for a more accurate representation of force
- Idea for Better Test
- Flutter Velocity/ Divergence Velocity
- Assuming elastic axis is .5 and fin CG is at .71, Max Divergence velocity is 2.36 Mach and max flutter velocity is 2.73 Mach.
- Both don't fit within factor of safety, need to work on better ways to model, especially with the composite make of the fin.
- Assuming elastic axis is .5 and fin CG is at .71, Max Divergence velocity is 2.36 Mach and max flutter velocity is 2.73 Mach.
- Stagnation Temperature
- Max is 239 degrees F
- System 2000 epoxy has a glass transition at 196 degrees F
- need to use epoxy with higher glass transition bound (system 400 at 275 degrees F
- Materials: need DP-420 NS Epoxy for fillets and System 4000/4600 Hardener
- Fin Manufacturing
- Waterjet G-10 Cores
- 5 Carbon fiber layups and sanding
- Leading edge
- emphasis on symmetry
- Sanding board at angle is constrained by the 2 x 4s, fin is slowly slid in with different holders for each leading edge.
- need to calculate geometry for a defined inner angle
- Alignment Jigs
- Jig for fiberglass layups
- Camera Shells
- TLDR: old prometheus camera shell works better at Mach 1
- enacting ANSYS simulations need work because the results we have gotten are off in terms of magnitude
- Manufacturing
- 3D printed mold and fiberglass layups
- Testing Plans
- Need to test shell and camera under heat and load from drag
- TLDR: old prometheus camera shell works better at Mach 1