Design 1:
Home Screen:
| Storyboard | Learnability | Efficiency | Safety | Visibility |
---|
Image Added Image Added Image Added Image Added
| When Joe starts LocaShare,he sees the home screen shown in the figure.
* Upon clicking the link “view” near (i), he sees the names of social contacts that are near his current location. By clicking on the button “View Contact”, he can view further details.
* Upon clicking the link “view” near (ii), he sees the names of people who added him as a contact. The relationship between Joe and that person (e.g., Susan) is not established till Joe also adds Susan as his social contact. By pressing the button “Set Permissions”, Joe can add Susan to his list. If he does not want to share his location information with Susan, he can choose to “Deny Request” and Susan would not be able to track his location (since he will not appear as her social contact). By selecting either “Set Permissions” or “Deny Request”, he can remove the person’s name from this screen.
* Upon clicking the link “view” near (iii), he sees a list containing thenames of stores that are offering discounts or sales in exchange for his location information.
In all the three cases, he can choose to return back to the home screen.
| Pros: 1. Easy to learn where to click and how to navigate by providing texts on the labels. However, it pays the price of simplicity.
Cons: - Back button at the bottom is inconsistent with other mobile apps. The way of receiving notification is also inconsistent with other social apps such as Facebook. - The user interface uses jargons (social/commercial contacts and GPS coordinates) which makes hard for users to understand. - Too many duplicate "View contact" buttons. Instead, the interface should use arrows (">") to be more consistent with other mobile apps. | Pros: - Viewing social/commercial contact requests can be done in a single click.
Cons: - If the list of contacts is long, users need to scroll down on the long list.
| The error here might be viewing the wrong deal or contact. Users can undo this action by pressing the back button.
| Pros: The most essential capabilities are directly visible. Graphical representation of what the task entails.
Cons: - Only numbers are directly visible, if you know that someone has added you (if they notify you), you still have to click the "view" link and then acknowledge the relationship.
- The "view" hyperlink does not provide enough information scent. |
Task 1: Add Social Contacts:
| Storyboard | Learnability | Efficiency | Safety | Visibility
|
---|
Image Added Image Added
| Joe starts from the home screen and clicks on the tab “Social Contacts”. He is then taken to the screen shown here that can be considered the “Home Screen” to handle his social contacts. Here, he can (i) search for an existing social contact or (ii) add a new one.
Since Bob is not on his contact list, he selects “Add New Contact”. He is then taken to the screen that shows the various settings he can use to control the amount and type of his location information that Bob can view.
He can create settings according to what he wishes to share (in detail or in aggregate) with Bob. He then clicks the button called “Save Contact”. He can also cancel the form and start it again, if he wants to.
The breadcrumb trail helps the user navigate back to home screen of the app or home screen of the social contacts.
| Pros:
- Providing the map option makes it easy to learn and adapt since it is externally consistent with apps like Google Maps. - The map provides good affordances and users can do direct manipulation on it. Cons: - The screen does not indicate which options are compulsory and which may be skipped. - The word "search for existing contact" is misleading because it has both the functionality of "search for existing and new contact." - The "Add new contact" is inconsistent with other social apps. It should come along with the contact instead of being as a static button. Also, the search bar location is inconsistent with other social apps. - The interface does not speak users' language. Too many jargons (Frequency, GPS coordinate, and radius) are used in the permission setting. - Lack of immediate feedback. Users are unable to know what data they will share with the settings. An example here would be helpful. | Cons: - The list of options may seem tedious for many users.
- If the user wants to share the same type of location with multiple users, she will have to enter the same details all over again. Aggregation of location types may be helpful. Or, the interface should provide default/ recommended settings. | Possible to make mistakes and over-/under share information. Confirmation dialogs may be helpful.
| Pros: Controls are clearly visible.
Cons:
- The search results might cover the "Add new contact" button.
- Duplicate search hints, that is, "Searching for existing contacts" and the "search" button. |
Task 2: View real-time location of social contacts:
| Storyboard | Learnability | Efficiency | Safety | Visibility
|
---|
Image Added Image Added Image Added
| Once Bob adds Joe as a contact, Joe can now search for Bob in his social contacts. He sees the screen shown here that indicates Bob’s current location (depending on what Bob allowed him to view). Joe can also choose to view historical locations visited by Bob or Bob’s aggregated information. On the similar screen on Bob’s application, where Bob would be viewing Joe’s profile, Bob would see that the button “View Aggregated Information” would be disabled since Joe did not allow Bob to view his aggregated information. Suppose that a month has passed since Joe added Bob to his contact list. Joe can view Bob’s historical data by clicking on the button called “View Past Locations”. He would then see this screen that shows Bob’s locations using markers on three different maps. These three maps correspond to a daily, weekly and monthly summary of Bob’s locations (based on the permissions that Bob set for Joe).
The breadcrumb trail helps the user navigate back to home screen of the app or home screen of the social contacts.
| Pros: - The map is a good affordance for location.Also, the map widget is also externally consistent with other location based apps.
Cons: - The interface does not speak users' language. Users might not know the meaning of "aggregated information." . - The data presented may be confusing to some users. What is the difference between history and aggregation? -* *The interface should provide a list of friends to be more consistent with other social apps. | Pros: - View others location can be done in a single click. - Auto-complete in the search bar makes it more efficient for users to find friends since they don't need to provide the full name of the contact.
Cons: - The user has to explicitly search for the contact to be able to view location. Would be better if there was an alphabetical list of contacts that the user could scroll through.
| The possible mistake here would be viewing at a undesired friend's profile. However, this mistake can be solved by clicking on the "Back" button on the browser.
| Pros: The most important detail (current location) is salient in an understandable manner in a quick glance |
GR2 - Designs
Actors:
The main actors involved in the scenario are:
1. Joe, an unmarried college student who wants to update his friends about his visits to new or interesting places and is interested in receiving as many relevant offers as possible,
2. Alice, a middle-aged parent who primarily wants to keep track of her family members.
3. Bob, Joe's high school friend, married employee who cares a lot about the amount and type of information he shares with others, and wants to primarily connect with friends and family, and,
Scenario:
Description:
Joe decides to join a group of friends on a ski trip, and in this trip, he wants to meet some new friends, keep in touch with the old ones, and try not to spend too much money in the resort since he still needs to pay for his student loan. By using LocaShare, it helps Joe :
1. Have close contact with new friends and coordinate activities with the participants of the trip.
2. Enable his contacts in LocaShare to know his whereabouts during the trip.
3. Get discounts from the stores in the ski resort.
Tasks:
Assumption: All actors are logged into LocaShare.
Task 1: Add social contacts
Joe decides to take the ski shuttle to the ski resort. (because it is a way to save money and meet new people) When he gets on the shuttle, he surprisingly notices that his high school friend, Bob, is also going on the trip. He hasn't met Bob for a long time and wants to keep in touch with Bob, so he decides to add Bob to his social contacts in LocaShare.
1. He logs into the LocaShare app.
2. He
3. He inputs Bob as a new contact.
2. After Bob confirms this contact, he views Bob's profile on LocaShare.
3. He sets the permissions for Bob. Since, he and Bob are not close friends, he allows Bob to see his location only when he is physically present at the resort. He gives the following input to set the permissions:
a. Permissible locations
b. Radius
c. Value to be shared (GPS coordinates, Building/Street, Block, City, State, Country)
d. Frequency
e. Time(s) of the day that sharing is alright
f. Boolean value to indicate whether aggregation is allowed
In this scenario, Joe gives the following inputs:
a. Put a marker over Sunday River
b. 2 miles
c. GPS coordinates
d. Daily
e. 9am to 8pm
f. False (not checked)
Task 2: View real-time location of social contacts
The group leaves for the resort the next week and reach it on a Friday. Bob and Joe decide to meet over lunch after the ski lessons on Saturday. After his lesson, Joe heads to the nearby cafe where they had agreed to meet but does not find Bob there.
1. He pulls up Bob's profile from his list of social contacts
...
Task 3: View offers and opt-in to create commercial contacts |
---|
...
While waiting for Bob, Joe notices that he has a few offers from nearby stores.
1. He sees the list of various offers from nearby stores and selects one of them (Rei).
2. He views the required location information needed in exchange for the offer (specifying the amount and type of location information he has to share).
3. He agrees to the requirements of one offer. He then receives a coupon for ski gear from Rei on his phone.
:
| Storyboard | Learnability | Efficiency | Safety | Visibility
|
---|
Image Added Image Added Image Added Image Added | Joe starts from the home screen and clicks on the tab “Commercial Contacts”. He is then taken to the screen shown here that can be considered the “Home Screen” to handle his commercial contacts. Here, he can view various categories of products on a wheel.
Since Joe is at a ski resort and wants to buy some gear, he selects the wedge titled “Sporting Goods” and is taken to the next screen that shows him the list of stores selling sporting goods and having offers.
He can then click on the company providing the offers and see the details of the offers. To help Joe understand the exact information he would be sharing, LocaShare displays his current information as an example.
Joe can choose to accept or delete the offer by pressing the “Accept” or “Delete” buttons respectively. Once he accepts an offer, he would see a summary of the information he is about to share with Rei on the screen. He can choose to create a category in which to save Rei as a contact. He finishes the process by pressing the “Save Contact” button or cancel the offer by clicking “Cancel”.
The breadcrumb trail helps the user navigate back to home screen of the app or home screen of the commercial contacts.
| Pros: - Before confirming the relationship, the design gives feedback to the user about the location that will be shared.
Cons: - The numbers in circles could be misleading. Are they based on the number of offers in that category?
- Would the wheel rotate when swiped? That would be the user's model of such a construct. If the wheel is intended to be stationary, a list mechanism may be far easier to learn. Also, what do the size of the wedges mean?
- What does the chart in the third slide mean? Users do not have default sharing settings in this design and the user has not started sharing with Rei yet. The label should be modified to say "sample information"
| Pros: - The wheel analogy groups the offers and allows users to quickly navigate to the type of offer they are looking for. This avoid users from scrolling down on a long list to find a specific offer.
Cons: - Have to go through four screens to establish the commercial contact relationship.
- Having a search mechanism will be helpful since search is quicker than trying to locate a type of offer that does not neatly fit into any pre-defined category.
| Users may inadvertently over-share information. The only way to change this is by deleting the contact relationship.
Errors might also occur by clicking on "Accept" or "Delete" too quickly. A confirmation alert should be used here. | Pros: The wheel structure displays the major categories very visibly.
Helpful information is presented in an externally consistent manner (e.g., distance from the user's location to the store. this is similar to how Google Maps displays the location).
Cons:
- "Clicks to view" does not provide helpful information scent |
...
Task 4: View aggregate information of social contacts: | Storyboard | Learnability | Efficiency | Safety
| Visibility
|
---|
Image Added Image Added Image Added Image Added | Since Alice wants to view Joe’s aggregate information,
|
Joe promised his mother that he would call her during the evenings. However, he was too tired the first evening of the trip. Also, his mother (Alice) is currently visiting Asia and so their time schedules do not align well. She wants to ensure that Joe has reached the resort safely and so decides to view his aggregated location information to know his whereabouts.
1. She pulls up Joe's profile on the system.
...
she first searches for Joe on her “Home Screen” for social contacts. She then sees Joe’s profile as seen in this sketch. At a glance, she can see that he is near Sunday River and so she is relived that he reached the resort safe and sound. When she clicks on “View Aggregated Information”, she sees the following screen. She can see a summary of Joe’s location on a daily, weekly and monthly basis. Instead of a map view that showed Bob’s locations using markers, in this aggregated view, Alice can see a pie chart/wheel showing the amount of time Joe spent at various places. Alice can choose to drill down and get additional details by selecting a wedge from the wheel. Suppose that she selected the category “Campground” (shown as a shaded region), she can see a list of places related to “Campground” that Joe has been to and the amount of time he spent at each place.
The breadcrumb trail helps the user navigate back to home screen of the app or home screen of the social contacts.
| Pros: - Good affordance provided by the charts which implicitly represent aggregate information.
Cons: - The graphs do not really convey interesting information. May be helpful to show the information on the fourth screen on hover (instead of clicking and going to another screen).
| Pros: - The charts summarize complex aggregate information. this is an efficient way to represent data. Cons:
- Have to go through three screens to view the interested data. May be helpful to have hovering mechanisms that display necessary information to the user without the need to navigate through so many screens.
| Pros:
- No irreversible change can be done in this viewing task.
| Pros: - The charts are relatively salient users.
Cons: The word "view" does not provide helpful information scent.
- Too many charts can be confusing.
|
Task 5: Edit social contacts: | Storyboard | Learnability | Efficiency | Safety | Visibility
|
---|
Image Added Image Added | Since Joe wants to modify the location permissions for Bob, he first searches for Bob on the “Home
|
After a few days, the entire group return home. Joe and Bob decide to keep in touch after the trip. Joe then decides to let Bob view his location even after returning home.
1. He pulls up Bob's profile from his list of social contacts.
2. He first checks the type and amount of information that Bob was able to view about him.
Screen” for social contacts. After he comes to Bob’s profile, he clicks on Bob’s icon/photo and comes to this screen. Here he view the amount and type of information that Bob can view about him. [Note: Suppose that during the trip Joe allowed Bob to view his aggregated information.] Joe can see that Bob can see his current location as the lat/long in Cambridge, MA (his current location). He also sees the pie chart/wheel that describes the categorization of places that Bob was able to view about him. He can now choose to modify the permissions by clicking on the button called “Modify Permissions” or can choose to return by clicking “Cancel”. Once he clicks “Modify Permissions”, he taken to the permissions sketch described in task 1.
The breadcrumb trail helps the user navigate back to home screen of the app or home screen of the social contacts.
| Pros: - The chart is nternally consistent with task 6. Cons:
The task is not very easy to learn in these two slides, since the bulk of the editing happens in the permissions screen.
He "clicks on Bob's icon/photo and comes to this screen". How will users figure that out on their own?
Interface contains jargon. What does "GPS coordinates" mean?
| Pros: - Can edit permissions using a single button click.
- Cons:
May be helpful to have a "Cancel This Option" button beside the specific/aggregate information display. That way, the user does not have to go to the permissions screen to cancel aggregation option (for example).
| - No irreversible action possible in these two screens.
| Pros: - You can view all the information (both detailed and aggregated) that Bob can see displayed on the screen.
Cons:
The data that the social contact (user's friend, for example) can see is very visible and easy to understand.
The control for editing task is not visible at all |
...
Task 6: Edit commercial contacts: |
---|
...
One day, Joe sees a notification from Rei for ski equipment. However, he does not have a need for that now, and decides to stop Rei from seeing his location data any longer.
1. He pulls up Rei from his list of commercial contacts.
2. He checks the type and amount of information that Rei is able to view about him.
...
| Storyboard | Learnability | Efficiency | Safety | Visibility
|
---|
Image Added
| Since this task started with Joe seeing an offer from Rei, he is led to this sketch by clicking on Rei’s icon in the screen described in task 3 (that shows the two offers provided by Rei). In this screen, Joe can view the current and aggregate information that Rei is able to view about Joe. Since a commercial contact is not editable by Joe (it was tied to the specific offer), he can only choose to continue sharing the information or delete the contact. If he happens to accept multiple offers from Rei (that require different types and/or amounts of location information), this screen would show a summary of entire information set that he is sharing with that one store. In that case, clicking on “Delete Contact” will stop Rei from accessing any of the pieces of information it was able to access previously.
The breadcrumb trail helps the user navigate back to home screen of the app or home screen of the commercial contacts.
| Pros: - The chart design is internally consistent with that of task 5.
Cons:
- The task is not very easy to learn in this slide, since the bulk of the editing happens in the permissions screen. - The button labels are confusing because the "delete contact" and "cancel" seem to convey the same meaning.
| Pros: - All the necessary information is present on the screen. Therefore, the user does not have to navigate between screens or scroll to view additional details.
Cons: - May be helpful to have a "Cancel This Option" button beside the specific/aggregate information display. That way, the user does not have to go to the permissions screen to cancel aggregation option (for example). | Cons: - What if the user wants to share a subset of information with Rei? This design describes an all-or-nothing approach.
| Pros: - Necessary information is visible on the screen.
Cons: - The data that the social contact (Rei, for example) can see is very visible and easy to understand |