You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Purpose

Hermes Flight 2 failed due to aerodynamic forces at approximately 7s into flight. It is speculated that pitch-roll coupling ('coning') contributed to the demise of Hermes 2. To mitigate pitch roll coupling it is necessary to maintain a frequency separation between the pitch and roll modes. Pitch modes are energetic and stochastic depending on winds at liftoff, rail angle, vehicle parameters, and more. Roll modes depend mostly on fin attachment precision. A reaction wheel that could manage roll around the long axis of the vehicle could prevent coning from occurring during the flight of Hermes 3.

 

Requirements

The following requirements are self imposed

Description
Component
Compliance
Fail SafeSystem 
Sufficient Momentum to maintain ωz <<< ωySystem 


Design

Let us assume Hermes is a thin tube with a diameter of .155m and a dry mass of 44kg. Mass moment of inertia is  I = mr^2 which means that Hermes has a mass moment of inertia about the long axis of   .264275 kgm^2. Using a 1.5 FoS on the Hermes 2 roll rate the maximum angular momentum capacity of the reaction wheel is  L_{max} = 2.8 hz * 1.5 *.265kgm^2 = 1.113 kgm^2/s. In other words this reaction wheel will be designed to mitigate 1.5x the maximum roll rate of Hermes 2 at burnout.
A straightforward reaction wheel design would have maximum OD of 5.5 in or .14m. The 335kv motors can obtain a max RPM of 4800. Conservatively using 3500 RPM or 583.3 hz, we can calculate the necessary moment of inertia of the reaction wheel to be .00191 kgm^2 which is a disk of 0.8kg or a thin walled tube of 0.4kg.

Hardware

Pyxida will send I2C commands to a Teensy 3.5 which will PWM Control 60A Hobbyking ESC units that drive Quantum MT motors. The system is powered by a 4s LiPo battery.

Testing

  • No labels