You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 12 Next »

Notes for future years from the 2010/2011 season
  • Website issues:
    • Fix the transcript problem – change the language so that students enter all their grades in chronological order.
    • Add more terms to search process – make it easier to find unreviewed/uncompleted folders. Also, how do we search for numbers of reviews, number of completed reviews, etc.?
    • Can we merge in recommender statistics from EECS previous years?
    • The research areas are hard to decrypt. What is ACE?
    • Can we allow users to hide the scores on the folder list page? (They scores are missing from the individual folder pages, but the list shows them.)
  • Evaluation issues:
    • Need to grow the GAC, make sure we get coverage in all areas. 6 and 2/2 GAC members is way too few.
    • Determine better TOEFL cut-off process. Also compare success rates vs. TOEFL scores of matriculated grad students.
    • Should we have a GRE cut-off like the TOEFL?
    • Revisit the issue of the 3rd reviewer. Folders are getting a lot of review now. If a folder gets 3 GAC reviews and is AD, then it will get at least 2 from the sector, for a minimum of 5 reviews. Maybe in the future if the reviews conflict, it should go the sector to resolve the conflict.
    • Visit the issue of applicants who failed the quals twice. Are they allowed to apply, and how do we evaluate them fairly?
    • We evaluate SM applicants differently from PhD applicants. Should we evaluate SM applicants who clearly only want an SM (e.g., USAF) differently from applicants who might go on to get a PhD? If not, we should make this explicit to reviewers. If so, we should enforce the difference at quals time.
    • Can a faculty member force a fast-track even with low GAC scores? Suppose the low GAC scores were given by reviewers outside the area? Fast-track is a competitive advantage. If the candidate is admissible, and someone wants the fast-track, what's the argument against?
  • Others
    • Get Stanford open house date early. It turns out that our entire schedule can be affected by this.
    • Change aa-gac mailing list to be a mailman list with [AA-GAC] prepended to subject and also Wiki and applyweb URLs in footer.

  • No labels