You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 8 Next »

Agenda for the GAC meeting, 1/12/2012
  • Review status
    • 452 complete and assigned, 25 missing material, 23 rejected due to low TOEFL, 2 rejected as incomplete.
      • 4 processed as off-cycle
      • 87 Admissible, sent for sector review
      • 58 Inadmissible, no further action.
      • Of those 145, 7 had a third review.
      • (Last year by now, we had 110 sent to sectors, 117 deemed inadmissible, with 49 third reviews).
    • Of the remaining 307:
      • 43 ready for decision
      • 22 Pending GAC 3rd review
      • 242 Pending initial GAC review
  • Review rejected minority/female candidates
    • Possibly reconsider:
      • Adrian Bullock – check with Martinez-Sanchez
      • Joseph Bynoe – Lozano says yes, increase to 2.
      • Eden Dahan – ask Dave Miller
      • Edwin Gomez – are the 1's just a result of the GREs? Seemed to do better at MIT. Double-check with Hamsa
    • Unlikely to reconsider:
      • Neeti Banerjee – weak letters, grades
      • Timothy Bright – grades just too low.
      • Angelica Ceniceros – weak letters, grades. Wardle confirmed his 2 is a weak 2.
      • Brittany Essink – grades not disastrously weak, GRE showed improvement. Wardle confirmed his 2 is a weak 2.
      • Esteban Maradona – grades low, Wardle confirmed his 2 is a weak 2.
      • Luz Maria Martinez Sierra – grades low, GRE low, letters not overwhelming.
      • Rochelle Mellish – double-check with Frazzoli. Nick says no.
      • Natalie Spenser — grades low, no academic letters.
  • Paulo Lozano : Sarah Seger and send Sara Jamil folder.
  • Prakash Shrestha : inappropriate contact with Beth. Need to look carefully about this candidate.
  • Issue with forged letters. Nick to contact letter writers of Dinesh Sivanandan
  • Open house
  • Sector meetings
  • Need to get USAF academy rankings
  • Need to start collecting yield data
  • No labels