You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 13 Next »

Progress

CloningTransfectionDoxCytometryData Analyis
LRs transformed    

 

Procedure

TRE

       
LacI      10mM
CumateCumate      
EGSHPonasterone A0uM0.1uM0.5uM1uM5uM10uM

Background 

To determine the optimal level of expression of BCR components and Syk-TEVp, we are placing them under the control of inducible/repressible promoters. This experiment aims to characterize the activity of the promoters we are going to use: TREt and pLac. 

The pLac system may not be ideal to modulate expression given it's quick on/off response. We looked into other inducible expression systems:

EGSH promoter: http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K415507

Cumate promoter: 

http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K875001

RheoSwitch: 

http://66.155.211.155/nebecomm/products_Intl/productE3000.asp

RheoSwitch uses a Gal4 activator and the gene to be expressed is under control of a Gal4 response element. We can't use that because we are already using  gal4 transcriptional activation to mediate receptor activation response. 

Approach

We are going to investigate the expression of mKate driven by each of the promoters with varying concentrations of inducer (dox) and repressor (IPTG).

Parts

PartStatus
hEF1a:rtTA 
TRE:mKate 
pLac:mKate 
hEF1a:LacI 
hEF1a:CymR 
hEF1a-Cuo:mKate 
CMV5-CuO:mKate 
EGSH:mKate 
hEf1a:VgEcR-2A-RXR 

References

Ecsydone responsive promoter:

http://www.biotechniques.com/multimedia/archive/00011/01312rr03_11591a.pdf

other paper

Data 

Discussion

  • No labels